2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-020-05333-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing current and future trends of climate extremes across Brazil based on reanalyses and earth system model projections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
58
2
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
7
58
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The Xavier et al (2016) dataset was produced based on observations from 3625 rain gauges and 735 wheatear stations in the Brazilian territory and is extensively used as the ground-truth reference for the validation of precipitation products, including the CHIRPS, MSWEP, and the soil moisture satellite-corrected estimates (SM2RAIN; Brocca et al, 2014;Paredes-Trejo et al, 2018), the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM; Hou et al, 2014); Gadelha et al, 2019), and the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM; Huffman et al, 2007;Melo et al, 2015). Other uses of this dataset include the evaluation of precipitation from downscaled global circulation models (Almagro et al, 2020), as well as other meteorological variables used in regional studies (Battisti et al, 2019;Bender and Sentelhas, 2018;Monteiro et al, 2018), aside from being widely used for hydrological studies (Almagro et al, 2017;Avila-Diaz et al, 2020;Lima and AghaKouchak, 2017;Souza et al, 2016). The main limitation of Xavier's dataset it that it only covers Brazil.…”
Section: Comparison With the Camels-br And Broader Implications For Hydrological Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Xavier et al (2016) dataset was produced based on observations from 3625 rain gauges and 735 wheatear stations in the Brazilian territory and is extensively used as the ground-truth reference for the validation of precipitation products, including the CHIRPS, MSWEP, and the soil moisture satellite-corrected estimates (SM2RAIN; Brocca et al, 2014;Paredes-Trejo et al, 2018), the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM; Hou et al, 2014); Gadelha et al, 2019), and the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM; Huffman et al, 2007;Melo et al, 2015). Other uses of this dataset include the evaluation of precipitation from downscaled global circulation models (Almagro et al, 2020), as well as other meteorological variables used in regional studies (Battisti et al, 2019;Bender and Sentelhas, 2018;Monteiro et al, 2018), aside from being widely used for hydrological studies (Almagro et al, 2017;Avila-Diaz et al, 2020;Lima and AghaKouchak, 2017;Souza et al, 2016). The main limitation of Xavier's dataset it that it only covers Brazil.…”
Section: Comparison With the Camels-br And Broader Implications For Hydrological Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CC BY 4.0 License. Monteiro et al, 2018), aside from being widely used for hydrological studies (Almagro et al, 2017;Avila-Diaz et al, 2020;Lima and AghaKouchak, 2017;Souza et al, 2016).…”
Section: Comparison With the Camels-br And Broader Implications For Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies indicate a very consistent warming all over the country (Skansi et al ., 2013; Geirinhas et al ., 2018; Avila‐Diaz et al ., 2020; Dereczynski et al ., 2020). This homogeneous pattern of a single sign for different regions of Brazil is not observed for changes in precipitation extremes, which show very heterogeneous signs, even within the same city.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%