2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing capacities of non-Annex I countries for national forest monitoring in the context of REDD+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
139
0
13

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
139
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Reviews of REDD+ cases across several countries have shown capacity building to be a central objective which issues from international guidelines on REDD+ [10]. However, literature also shows the great deal of financial, technical and administrative resources being devoted to capacity building for REDD+ is not translating to commensurate improvement in local and national capacity, thereby pointing to the motley of factors that shape capacity building processes [6,41,65,92]. Part of the problem, Lund et al [41] argue in their analysis of Tanzania, is the inherent and insidiously alienating technicality and complexity of REDD+ which "did not fall from the sky" but has been produced through the self-interested and self-reproducing ways in which actors in the state, civil society and international organisations project REDD+ [30,43,93].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reviews of REDD+ cases across several countries have shown capacity building to be a central objective which issues from international guidelines on REDD+ [10]. However, literature also shows the great deal of financial, technical and administrative resources being devoted to capacity building for REDD+ is not translating to commensurate improvement in local and national capacity, thereby pointing to the motley of factors that shape capacity building processes [6,41,65,92]. Part of the problem, Lund et al [41] argue in their analysis of Tanzania, is the inherent and insidiously alienating technicality and complexity of REDD+ which "did not fall from the sky" but has been produced through the self-interested and self-reproducing ways in which actors in the state, civil society and international organisations project REDD+ [30,43,93].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in one extensive review of the capacity of 99 countries to engage in REDD+ [65] found that "very large capacity gaps were observed in forty-nine countries, mostly in Africa". This and many other studies have called for institutional and technical capacity for countries as a key focus of implementation of REDD+ [41,92].…”
Section: Capacity Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The repetitive global nature of these images is especially important for those working in places with persistent cloud cover, where capturing every avail able clear pixel of imagery is a necessity due to frequently obscuring clouds. These areas are among the most biologically diverse and often located in places having less capacity for in situ monitoring (Romijn et al, 2012).…”
Section: Data Continuitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Grainger and Obersteiner (2011) also observe, the few studies that have attempted to examine whether REDD+ countries fulfil UNFCCC's requirements for MRV (e.g. Romijn et al, 2012; have concentrated on technical aspects only, leaving out institutional and governance aspects. This dissertation addresses this research gap by examining REDD+ countries' progress in meeting technical and governance requirements for MRV.…”
Section: Scholarship On Forest Monitoring For Redd+ and Emerging Resementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers Grainger and Obersteiner, 2011;Herold, 2009;Herold and Johns, 2007;Palmer Fry, 2011;Pratihast et al, 2013;Romijn et al, 2012;Skutsch and McCall, 2010) have examined the technical capacity of REDD+ countries to monitor REDD+ impacts. These researchers have concluded that most REDD+ countries not only have low technical capacity but also weak institutional capacity to monitor REDD+ impacts.…”
Section: Scholarship On Forest Monitoring For Redd+ and Emerging Resementioning
confidence: 99%