2018
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Biological and Methodological Aspects of Brain Volume Loss in Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Before using brain volume loss (BVL) as a marker of therapeutic response in multiple sclerosis (MS), certain biological and methodological issues must be clarified. OBJECTIVES To assess the dynamics of BVL as MS progresses and to evaluate the repeatability and exchangeability of BVL estimates with Jacobian Integration (JI) and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB) Software Library (FSL) (specifically, the Structural Image Evaluation, Using Normalisation, of Atrophy-Cross-Section… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
49
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
8
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A change of -0.4% per year has been proposed as the cut off for pathological brain atrophy in MS 24 ( Fig. 1), although care must be taken before applying this threshold as a marker of ther apeutic efficacy owing to the phenomenon of pseudo atrophy (see Brain volume as an outcome measure in randomized clinical trials) 25,26 . Multiple studies have shown that short term changes (over as little as 1 year) in brain volume are predictive of clinical status (diagnosis of MS or disability status) at various follow up times in clinically isolated syndromes 27,28 , relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) 29 and primary progressive MS [30][31][32] , either in isolation or together with lesion related parameters 33,34 .…”
Section: Global Brain Volume Measures To Define and Predict Ms Severitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A change of -0.4% per year has been proposed as the cut off for pathological brain atrophy in MS 24 ( Fig. 1), although care must be taken before applying this threshold as a marker of ther apeutic efficacy owing to the phenomenon of pseudo atrophy (see Brain volume as an outcome measure in randomized clinical trials) 25,26 . Multiple studies have shown that short term changes (over as little as 1 year) in brain volume are predictive of clinical status (diagnosis of MS or disability status) at various follow up times in clinically isolated syndromes 27,28 , relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) 29 and primary progressive MS [30][31][32] , either in isolation or together with lesion related parameters 33,34 .…”
Section: Global Brain Volume Measures To Define and Predict Ms Severitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify brain volumes, we registered T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images to T1-magnetisation prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE) scans to ease manual segmentation of the lesions by a trained neurologist (IPV). After lesion in-painting of the T1-MPRAGE scan, we applied a registration-based Jacobian integration algorithm to quantify annual changes in whole brain, grey matter (this metric included cortical and deep gray matter) and thalamic volumes relative to the baseline, according to the methodology described elsewhere 5,17 . In addition, a trained neuro-radiologist quantified the number of gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions (Gad+) and new/enlarging T2-FLAIR lesions.…”
Section: Retinal Imaging Acquisition and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chronic T2 lesions with evolving T1 hypointensity may also be considered as a readout for permanent tissue damage accumulation, as well as whole-brain volume loss, where more research is needed to discriminate pathological atrophy from normal aging or noise of the measurement, and determine personalized thresholds of annualized rates of brain volume change. [28][29][30] FIGURE 5: Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to evidence of progression or active disease in the ITT population during the doubleblind controlled period in ORATORIO. Patients are considered as failing NEPAD if one of the following events occurred: protocol-defined relapse, 12-week CDP, 12-week confirmed progression on T25FW or 9HPT, or MRI activity.…”
Section: <0001mentioning
confidence: 99%