2021
DOI: 10.1111/brv.12705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ashmole's hypothesis and the latitudinal gradient in clutch size

Abstract: One enduring priority for ecologists has been to understand the cause(s) of variation in reproductive effort among species and localities. Avian clutch size generally increases with increasing latitude, both within and across species, but the mechanism(s) driving that pattern continue to generate hypotheses and debate. In 1961, a Ph.D. student at Oxford University, N. Philip Ashmole, proposed the influential hypothesis that clutch size varies in direct proportion to the seasonality of resources available to a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
(262 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, asynchronous hatching has evolved independently in numerous avian lineages (Stoleson and Beissinger 1995), and many causal hypotheses have been proposed that assume that asynchronous hatching is adaptive and is part of an explicit life‐history strategy (Lack 1947, Magrath 1990, Stoleson and Beissinger 1995). Well‐known explanations proposed for both asynchronous hatching and the correlation between clutch size and latitude have largely focused on biotic processes such as variation in food limitation and predation risk (e.g., Lack 1947, Skutch 1949, Ashmole 1961, Ricklefs 1980, Magrath 1990, Lundblad and Conway 2021a). In contrast, less attention has been given to abiotic and thermal mechanisms that could explain these two ubiquitous patterns (but see Cody 1966, Stoleson and Beissinger 1999, Reid et al 2000, Cooper et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, asynchronous hatching has evolved independently in numerous avian lineages (Stoleson and Beissinger 1995), and many causal hypotheses have been proposed that assume that asynchronous hatching is adaptive and is part of an explicit life‐history strategy (Lack 1947, Magrath 1990, Stoleson and Beissinger 1995). Well‐known explanations proposed for both asynchronous hatching and the correlation between clutch size and latitude have largely focused on biotic processes such as variation in food limitation and predation risk (e.g., Lack 1947, Skutch 1949, Ashmole 1961, Ricklefs 1980, Magrath 1990, Lundblad and Conway 2021a). In contrast, less attention has been given to abiotic and thermal mechanisms that could explain these two ubiquitous patterns (but see Cody 1966, Stoleson and Beissinger 1999, Reid et al 2000, Cooper et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In birds, clutch size generally increases with latitude, the cause of which has been the focus of many competing classical hypotheses (i.e. Lack's rule, Ashmole's hypothesis, reviewed in Lundblad & Conway, 2021). This background led us to expect that clutch size in A. bruennichi would increase with latitude, which makes it all the more interesting that we find the opposite pattern.…”
Section: Reproductive Successmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Older and larger parents, and parents rearing broods in safe habitats can benefit from the increased reproductive potential resulting from rearing more male offspring. Yet, the adaptability of brood size may depend on life history traits, population demographics, and biogeographical distribution of species (Skutch 1949, Skutch 1967, Lundblad and Conway 2021a. For instance, tropical birds tend to have small clutches that rarely vary in number regardless of whether parental care is provided by one or two parents (Skutch 1949).…”
Section: Effect Of Treatments On Habitat Selection By Adult Females and Malesmentioning
confidence: 99%