2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2013.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artin–Schreier extensions and generalized associated orders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) The inverse different D −1 L/K is free over its associated order if and only if b = p − 1. These statements also follow from [Fer73,Aib03,dST07,Mar13,Huy14]. The purpose of this paper is to extend these cyclic results to typical extensions L/K, including those that are not Galois.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(3) The inverse different D −1 L/K is free over its associated order if and only if b = p − 1. These statements also follow from [Fer73,Aib03,dST07,Mar13,Huy14]. The purpose of this paper is to extend these cyclic results to typical extensions L/K, including those that are not Galois.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Indeed, (4) determine the number of generators for P n L over A H (n) if it is not free, and (5) determine the embedding dimension dim κ (M/M 2 ). Indeed, as a result of the scaffold, the results of [Fer73,Aib03,dST07,Mar13,Huy14] under (6), proven for Galois extensions, hold for non-Galois extensions as well.…”
Section: Hopf-galois Module Structurementioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In characteristic 0, Ferton [Fer73] determines which ideals are free over their associated orders, giving her result in terms of the continued fraction expansion of b 1 /p. A corresponding result in characteristic p is given by Huynh [Huy14], who gives a different criterion but proves it is equivalent to Ferton's. Our condition, w(s) = d(s) for all s, must therefore be equivalent to Ferton's continued fraction criterion.…”
Section: Thus We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example 1.2 in itself is nothing new. Indeed, far more comprehensive treatments of the valuation ring of an extension of degree p are given in [BF72,BBF72] for the characteristic 0 case, and in [Aib03,dST07] for characteristic p. (See also [Fer73] for arbitrary ideals in characteristic 0, and [Huy14] and [Mar14] for the corresponding problem in characteristic p.) We now consider what happens if we try to make the same argument for a larger extension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%