2012
DOI: 10.2166/hydro.2012.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial neural network (ANN) modeling of dynamic effects on two-phase flow in homogenous porous media

Abstract: The dynamic effect in two-phase flow in porous media indicated by a dynamic coefficient τ depends on a number of factors (e.g. medium and fluid properties). Varying these parameters parametrically in mathematical models to compute τ incurs significant time and computational costs. To circumvent this issue, we present an artificial neural network (ANN)-based technique for predicting τ over a range of physical parameters of porous media and fluid that affect the flow. The data employed for training the ANN algor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(43 reference statements)
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present work, we include an additional independent variable, i.e., intensity of heterogeneity (Das et al 2004;Mirzaei and Das 2007) to account for the amount of heterogeneity in the computational domain. Furthermore, an average permeability of the heterogeneous domain is used instead of the homogeneous domain permeability as previously used by Hanspal et al (2013). Similar to Hanspal et al (2013), we argue that the effects of any other system parameters (e.g., interfacial tension, entry pressure of porous domain) that are not explicitly accounted for in the ANN structure are lumped in the values of the saturation (input) and dynamic coefficient (output).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the present work, we include an additional independent variable, i.e., intensity of heterogeneity (Das et al 2004;Mirzaei and Das 2007) to account for the amount of heterogeneity in the computational domain. Furthermore, an average permeability of the heterogeneous domain is used instead of the homogeneous domain permeability as previously used by Hanspal et al (2013). Similar to Hanspal et al (2013), we argue that the effects of any other system parameters (e.g., interfacial tension, entry pressure of porous domain) that are not explicitly accounted for in the ANN structure are lumped in the values of the saturation (input) and dynamic coefficient (output).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, an average permeability of the heterogeneous domain is used instead of the homogeneous domain permeability as previously used by Hanspal et al (2013). Similar to Hanspal et al (2013), we argue that the effects of any other system parameters (e.g., interfacial tension, entry pressure of porous domain) that are not explicitly accounted for in the ANN structure are lumped in the values of the saturation (input) and dynamic coefficient (output). Of course, an ANN such as the present one may include as many parameters as one would like as input and output variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations