2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12210-015-0461-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arsenic removal from naturally contaminated waters: a review of methods combining chemical and biological treatments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, commercially nano-sized magnetite (25-50 nm) may cost $500/kg while microbial processes are potentially capable of producing 5-90 nm pure or substituted magnetites at a fraction of the cost of traditional chemical synthesis (Moon et al, 2010). In the last decades, arsenic nano-and bioremediation has received significant attention due to its cost effectiveness and environmental compatibility [56][57][58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, commercially nano-sized magnetite (25-50 nm) may cost $500/kg while microbial processes are potentially capable of producing 5-90 nm pure or substituted magnetites at a fraction of the cost of traditional chemical synthesis (Moon et al, 2010). In the last decades, arsenic nano-and bioremediation has received significant attention due to its cost effectiveness and environmental compatibility [56][57][58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the identification and the exploitation of microbial metabolic potentialities for arsenic-contaminated water treatment are considered an emerging challenge as mirrored by an increasing number of recent studies ( Crognale et al, 2017 ). Among the available bacterial-driven processes, bioprecipitation, biosynthesis of adsorbent materials, biosorption and biovolatilization, involving several microorganisms ( Table 1 ), are the most interestingly described for bioremediation of arsenic-contaminated waters ( Fazi et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Arsenic Bioremediation and ‘Omics’ Approaches: A Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method removes pollutants isolated from the liquid process, and the adsorbent may disperse pollutants after adsorption without any specific environmental hazard. [36][37][38] Although many adsorbents have been used for this purpose, the use of cost-effective, efficient, and multifunctional nanostructures is very important. [39] Activated carbon, [40] zeolites, [41] magnetite nanoparticles, [42] and carbon nanotubes [43] like adsorbent have been already used to remove arsenic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%