Treatise on Geochemistry 2003
DOI: 10.1016/b0-08-043751-6/09047-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arsenic and Selenium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
144
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 201 publications
3
144
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are probably due to the difference on water chemistry; the Se-rich VF effluents are characterized by a neutral to high (6−8) pH, while the water-soluble leachates from the laboratory experiments were much more acidic ( Table 1). Given that selenium mobilization is expected to intensify under elevated pH conditions, 39 we posit that the generation of sulfuric acid from pyrite oxidation would trigger carbonate dissolution, which would buffer the pH of VF effluents and further enhance selenium mobilization from the carbonate phases. We conclude that the geochemical and isotopic changes we observed in leachates from rocks spanning the transition from Allegheny to Kanawha Formations are representative of the expected composition of the blended rock found in VFs and the resulting chemical influence they have on the headwaters flowing to the Mud River.…”
Section: Environmental Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are probably due to the difference on water chemistry; the Se-rich VF effluents are characterized by a neutral to high (6−8) pH, while the water-soluble leachates from the laboratory experiments were much more acidic ( Table 1). Given that selenium mobilization is expected to intensify under elevated pH conditions, 39 we posit that the generation of sulfuric acid from pyrite oxidation would trigger carbonate dissolution, which would buffer the pH of VF effluents and further enhance selenium mobilization from the carbonate phases. We conclude that the geochemical and isotopic changes we observed in leachates from rocks spanning the transition from Allegheny to Kanawha Formations are representative of the expected composition of the blended rock found in VFs and the resulting chemical influence they have on the headwaters flowing to the Mud River.…”
Section: Environmental Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Se concentrations varied greatly between the two morphologies or within the same morphological type in a single sample, overall Se concentrations tended to be higher in euhedral grains (Table 2 and Table S8 in the SI). Because of the close link between shale pyrite weathering and Se release, 8,12,22,23,29 hereafter we focused our Se μ-XAS analyses solely on samples UK-1 and UK-2. These represent typical shales containing pyrite and organic matter (Table S6 in the SI) and the highest bulk Se concentrations among the samples studied.…”
Section: Bulk Composition and Se Distribution In The Variousmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 However, neither the importance of OM as a Se host, nor a clear correlation between Se and OM in typical black shales, with average lower Se concentrations, have so far been demonstrated. Conversely, several studies proposed pyrite as the possible Se host mineral in shales, 5,8,16,17 yet a mechanistic or speciation related explanation is still lacking. Experimental studies 18−21 suggested that Se is likely either adsorbed/reduced on preformed pyrite grains or structurally incorporated into the sulfide phase.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most common sources of arsenic in the natural environment are volcanic rocks (specifically their weathering products and ash), marine sedimentary rocks, hydrothermal ore deposits and associated geothermal waters, and fossil fuels, including coals and petroleum (Wang and Mulligan 2006;Smedley and Kinniburgh 2002). Anthropogenic activity, such as gold mining, has contributed to a sharp rise in natural arsenic concentrations reported for many artesian water supplies, often exceeding 600 μg l -1 As (Duker et al 2005;Farias et al 2003;Plant et al 2003). Local communities use these water supplies for drinking, cooking (Tseng 2009;Roychowdhury et al 2005), cattle watering (Nriagu et al 2007) and crop irrigation Hossain 2006;Bundschuh et al 2004), creating a possible pathway for the arsenic to enter both the animal and human populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%