“…Most of the studies treated animals with AsIII or arsenic trioxide, but other arsenicals have also been studied (Aguilar et al 1997; Arnold et al 2003; Hill et al 2009; Paul et al 2008). The studies also vary in experimental design and model systems used to assess end points relevant to diabetes as a health effect, ranging from urinary glucose in fasted animals (Pal and Chatterjee 2005), to blood glucose in nonfasted animals (Mitchell et al 2000), to glucose tolerance test (Cobo and Castineira 1997; Ghafghazi et al 1980; Hill et al 2009; Paul et al 2007b, 2008, 2011; Wang et al 2009). Glucose was a commonly reported end point but findings were inconsistent across studies, which may stem from differences in the biological compartment assessed (urine, serum, plasma, whole blood) and fasting status of the animal (fasted, nonfasted, fasting status not reported) in addition to the differences in experimental design noted above related to arsenical tested, species, route of administration, and dose levels (Aguilar et al 1997; Arnold et al 2003; Biswas et al 2000; Boquist et al 1988; Ghafghazi et al 1980; Hill et al 2009; Izquierdo-Vega et al 2006; Judd 1979; Mitchell et al 2000; Pal and Chatterjee 2004a, 2004b, 2005; Paul et al 2007b, 2008, 2011; Wang et al 2009).…”