“…The outcomes were: (1) number of inactive carious surface [Chu et al, 2002a;Llodra et al, 2005;Yee et al, 2009b;Vasconcelos, 2011;Zhi et al, 2012;dos Santos et al, 2014;Duangthip et al, 2016]; (2) number of active carious surface [Llodra et al, 2005;Yee et al, 2009b;Vasconcelos, 2011;Liu et al, 2012;Monse et al, 2012;Seberol and Ökte, 2013;Chu et al, 2014;dos Santos et al, 2014]; (3) dmft index [Chu et al, 2002a;Llodra et al, 2005;Vasconcelos, 2011;dos Santos et al, 2012a;Seberol and Ökte, 2013]; (4) number of teeth with inactive carious lesions [dos Santos et al, 2012a]; (5) number of teeth with new carious lesions [Liu et al, 2012]; (6) number of inactive carious lesions in the first permanent molars [Llodra et al, 2005].…”