Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Confer 2021
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Argument Pair Extraction via Attention-guided Multi-Layer Multi-Cross Encoding

Abstract: Argument pair extraction (APE) is a research task for extracting arguments from two passages and identifying potential argument pairs. Prior research work treats this task as a sequence labeling problem and a binary classification problem on two passages that are directly concatenated together, which has a limitation of not fully utilizing the unique characteristics and inherent relations of two different passages. This paper proposes a novel attention-guided multi-layer multi-cross encoding scheme to address … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, there is a tremendous amount of research effort in the computational argumentation research field Bar-Haim et al, 2021), such as argument components identification Rinott et al, 2015;Lippi and Torroni, 2016;, argument classification and clustering (Reimers et al, 2019), argument relation prediction (Boltužić and Šnajder, 2016;Chakrabarty et al, 2019), argument pair extraction (Cabrio and Villata, 2012;Cheng et al, 2020Cheng et al, , 2021, argument quality assessment (Habernal and Gurevych, 2016;Wachsmuth et al, 2017;Gretz et al, 2020;Toledo et al, 2019), listening comprehension (Mirkin et al, 2018), etc. Meanwhile, researchers have been exploring new datasets and methods to automate the debating preparation process, such as project debater (Slonim et al, 2021), etc.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In recent years, there is a tremendous amount of research effort in the computational argumentation research field Bar-Haim et al, 2021), such as argument components identification Rinott et al, 2015;Lippi and Torroni, 2016;, argument classification and clustering (Reimers et al, 2019), argument relation prediction (Boltužić and Šnajder, 2016;Chakrabarty et al, 2019), argument pair extraction (Cabrio and Villata, 2012;Cheng et al, 2020Cheng et al, , 2021, argument quality assessment (Habernal and Gurevych, 2016;Wachsmuth et al, 2017;Gretz et al, 2020;Toledo et al, 2019), listening comprehension (Mirkin et al, 2018), etc. Meanwhile, researchers have been exploring new datasets and methods to automate the debating preparation process, such as project debater (Slonim et al, 2021), etc.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We implement the sentence-pair classification model and the multi-label model for CESC with the aid of SimpleTransformers (Rajapakse, 2019). The multi-task model for CEPE is based on the implementation of the multi-task framework by Cheng et al (2021). All models are run with V100 GPU.…”
Section: Experimental Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a salient part of argument mining (AM), the analysis of dialogical argumentation has received increasing research attention (Morio and Fujita, 2018;Chakrabarty et al, 2019;Cheng et al, 2021;Yuan et al, 2021). Argument pair extraction (APE), proposed by Cheng et al (2020), is a new task within this field that focuses on extracting interactive argument pairs from two interrelated documents (e.g., peer reviewer and rebuttal).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works (Cheng et al, 2020(Cheng et al, , 2021 commonly address APE by decomposing it into two sentence-level subtasks, i.e., a sequence labeling task and a sentence relation classification task. These methods identify arguments by sentencelevel sequence labeling and determine whether two sentences belong to the same argument pair by sentence relation classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%