1985
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Argon Laser Choroidotomy for Drainage of Subretinal Fluid
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
23
2
2
1
Citation Types
0
14
0
0
Year Published
Range
1987
19872026
2026Publication Types
Select...
23
2
Relationship
0
25
Authors
Journals
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
References 2 publications
0
14
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In cases of rhegmatogenous RD, the overall reported success rate of the conventional drainage of SRF ranged from 84 to 97% [16,[23][24][25] . Needle drainage seemed to have a higher success rate of 100% [18,19,26] .…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 46%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In cases of rhegmatogenous RD, the overall reported success rate of the conventional drainage of SRF ranged from 84 to 97% [16,[23][24][25] . Needle drainage seemed to have a higher success rate of 100% [18,19,26] .…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 46%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…These 3 and, more recently, the argon laser. 4 However, this complication occurs at a rate of 2% to 8.6% despite these advances." Retinal perforation is a less common but also potentially sight-threatening complication of draining subretinal fluid, occurring at a rate of 0.2% to 3.3%."…”
mentioning
confidence: 45%
“…This is to better visualize the choroidal vessels and thus minimize the risk of choroidal hemorrhage.3 7·1819 Despite this precau¬ tion, subretinal hemorrhage with mechanical perforation is reported in the literature at an incidence of 2% to 4.8%.3" This rate was 8.6% with the argon laser. 4 We obtained a 0% inci¬ dence of hemorrhage with the C02 laser even though we did not perform a sclerotomy before perforating the choroid. With transillumination2 to identify large choroidal vessels, the sclerotomy step in the drainage of subretinal fluid may prove an unnec¬ essary precaution in avoiding hemor¬ rhage if the C02 laser is used.…”
Section: Comment
mentioning
confidence: 47%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Drainage of subretinal fluid has been reported to be the most hazardous step in retinal detachment surgery (1) . The most common complications of subretinal fluid drainage include subretinal hemorrhage, retinal incarceration, and retinal perforation (2)(3) . Several external drainage techniques have been described (4)(5)(6) , such as using a suture needle and argon laser for scleral and choroidal perforation (2) .…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 44%
“…The most common complications of subretinal fluid drainage include subretinal hemorrhage, retinal incarceration, and retinal perforation (2)(3) . Several external drainage techniques have been described (4)(5)(6) , such as using a suture needle and argon laser for scleral and choroidal perforation (2) . In 1985, McLeod described a technique for posterior transcleral drainage of subretinal fluid monitored by indirect ophthalmoscopy to drain posteriorly sequestrated subretinal fluid following vitrectomy (3) .…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 44%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In cases of rhegmatogenous RD, the overall reported success rate of the conventional drainage of SRF ranged from 84 to 97% [16,[23][24][25] . Needle drainage seemed to have a higher success rate of 100% [18,19,26] .…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 46%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…These 3 and, more recently, the argon laser. 4 However, this complication occurs at a rate of 2% to 8.6% despite these advances." Retinal perforation is a less common but also potentially sight-threatening complication of draining subretinal fluid, occurring at a rate of 0.2% to 3.3%."…”
mentioning
confidence: 45%
“…This is to better visualize the choroidal vessels and thus minimize the risk of choroidal hemorrhage.3 7·1819 Despite this precau¬ tion, subretinal hemorrhage with mechanical perforation is reported in the literature at an incidence of 2% to 4.8%.3" This rate was 8.6% with the argon laser. 4 We obtained a 0% inci¬ dence of hemorrhage with the C02 laser even though we did not perform a sclerotomy before perforating the choroid. With transillumination2 to identify large choroidal vessels, the sclerotomy step in the drainage of subretinal fluid may prove an unnec¬ essary precaution in avoiding hemor¬ rhage if the C02 laser is used.…”
Section: Comment
mentioning
confidence: 47%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Drainage of subretinal fluid has been reported to be the most hazardous step in retinal detachment surgery (1) . The most common complications of subretinal fluid drainage include subretinal hemorrhage, retinal incarceration, and retinal perforation (2)(3) . Several external drainage techniques have been described (4)(5)(6) , such as using a suture needle and argon laser for scleral and choroidal perforation (2) .…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 44%
“…The most common complications of subretinal fluid drainage include subretinal hemorrhage, retinal incarceration, and retinal perforation (2)(3) . Several external drainage techniques have been described (4)(5)(6) , such as using a suture needle and argon laser for scleral and choroidal perforation (2) . In 1985, McLeod described a technique for posterior transcleral drainage of subretinal fluid monitored by indirect ophthalmoscopy to drain posteriorly sequestrated subretinal fluid following vitrectomy (3) .…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 44%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In cases of rhegmatogenous RD, the overall reported success rate of the conventional drainage of SRF ranged from 84 to 97% [16,[23][24][25] . Needle drainage seemed to have a higher success rate of 100% [18,19,26] .…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 46%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…These 3 and, more recently, the argon laser. 4 However, this complication occurs at a rate of 2% to 8.6% despite these advances." Retinal perforation is a less common but also potentially sight-threatening complication of draining subretinal fluid, occurring at a rate of 0.2% to 3.3%."…”
mentioning
confidence: 45%
“…This is to better visualize the choroidal vessels and thus minimize the risk of choroidal hemorrhage.3 7·1819 Despite this precau¬ tion, subretinal hemorrhage with mechanical perforation is reported in the literature at an incidence of 2% to 4.8%.3" This rate was 8.6% with the argon laser. 4 We obtained a 0% inci¬ dence of hemorrhage with the C02 laser even though we did not perform a sclerotomy before perforating the choroid. With transillumination2 to identify large choroidal vessels, the sclerotomy step in the drainage of subretinal fluid may prove an unnec¬ essary precaution in avoiding hemor¬ rhage if the C02 laser is used.…”
Section: Comment
mentioning
confidence: 47%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Drainage of subretinal fluid has been reported to be the most hazardous step in retinal detachment surgery (1) . The most common complications of subretinal fluid drainage include subretinal hemorrhage, retinal incarceration, and retinal perforation (2)(3) . Several external drainage techniques have been described (4)(5)(6) , such as using a suture needle and argon laser for scleral and choroidal perforation (2) .…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 44%
“…The most common complications of subretinal fluid drainage include subretinal hemorrhage, retinal incarceration, and retinal perforation (2)(3) . Several external drainage techniques have been described (4)(5)(6) , such as using a suture needle and argon laser for scleral and choroidal perforation (2) . In 1985, McLeod described a technique for posterior transcleral drainage of subretinal fluid monitored by indirect ophthalmoscopy to drain posteriorly sequestrated subretinal fluid following vitrectomy (3) .…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 44%