1998
DOI: 10.1093/ije/27.2.330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are there national risk factors for epidemic cholera? The correlation between socioeconomic and demographic indices and cholera incidence in Latin America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Typical at-risk areas include peri-urban slums, where basic infrastructure is not available, as well as camps for internally displaced people or refugees, where minimum requirements of clean water and sanitation are not met [1]. It was reported that in Latin America the gross national product per capita (above US $2,000) and literacy rates above 90% were negatively correlated with cholera cumulative incidence rates [2]. Specifically in Brazil, it was shown that the proportion of households without tap water was the variable that contributed the most to the increasing fluctuation of cholera incidence rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical at-risk areas include peri-urban slums, where basic infrastructure is not available, as well as camps for internally displaced people or refugees, where minimum requirements of clean water and sanitation are not met [1]. It was reported that in Latin America the gross national product per capita (above US $2,000) and literacy rates above 90% were negatively correlated with cholera cumulative incidence rates [2]. Specifically in Brazil, it was shown that the proportion of households without tap water was the variable that contributed the most to the increasing fluctuation of cholera incidence rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control group in this study came from Comas, a poverty zone of Lima severely affected by the cholera epidemic. Furthermore, symptomatic cholera is rare in upper or middle class individuals but common in the poor (Ackers et al, 1998). Previous studies have shown that the prevalence of H. pylori infection and severe gastric mucosa inflammation seen in the study groups, both of which are poor, is close to twice as common as that found in middle and upper class Peruvians (The Gastrointestinal Physiology Working Group of the Cayetano Heredia and the Johns Hopkins University, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This accounts for the major difference in the magnitude of mortality and morbidity rates between developed and developing countries. Among the communicable diseases, the NDs such as lymphatic filariasis may be considered proxy indicators of the level of socioeconomic development [15], and communicable diseases are pervasive in countries or regions where gross national product is low or income distribution highly skewed [16]. Some of these diseases would cease to exist with an increase of the gross national product and a more balanced income distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%