Are Points in Tennis Independent and Identically Distributed? Evidence From a Dynamic Binary Panel Data Model

Abstract

This article tests whether points in tennis are independent and identically distributed (iid). We model the probability of winning a point on service and show that points are neither independent nor identically distributed: winning the previous point has a positive effect on winning the current point, and at "important" points it is more dif cult for the server to win the point than at less important points. Furthermore, the weaker a player, the stronger are these effects. Deviations from iid are small, however, and hence the iid hypothesis will still provide a good approximation in many cases. The results are based on a large panel of matches played at Wimbledon 1992-1995, in total almost 90,000 points. Our panel data model takes into account the binary character of the dependent variable, uses random effects to capture the unobserved part of a player's quality, and includes dynamic explanatory variables.

Forecasting the winner of a tennis match

“…First, we assume that points are i.i.d., so that p a and p b stay xed during the match. As we h a ve demonstrated in Klaassen and Magnus (2001), points are not i.i.d., but the deviations from i.i.d. are small, so that in particular applications (such as forecasting) the i.i.d.…”

“…We brie y summarize the estimation procedure, which follows Klaassen and Magnus (2001), specialized to the situation where all points are i.i.d.…”

“…The question whether points in tennis are i.i.d. was investigated in Klaassen and Magnus (2001). They concluded that | although points are not i.i.d.…”

Heterogeneity and performance in tournaments: a test for incentive effects using professional tennis data

“…In fact, Klaassen and Magnus (2001) show that the probability of winning a point is not independent from who won the previous point, and that some points and F o r P e e r R e v i e w notation for match and tournament, and let the utility of a player be additively separable in the utility derived from winning the stage price and the disutility of exerting effort,…”

Do Firms Maximize? Evidence from Professional Football

“…First, the same reasoning suggests that there could be a motivational benefit to succeeding on fourth down, and thus that the analysis could understate the benefits of a successful fourth-down attempt. Second, studies of momentum in other sports have found at most small momentum effects (e.g., Gilovich, Vallone, and Tversky 1985;Albright 1993;Klaassen and Magnus 2001).…”