2017
DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are energy and protein requirements met in hospital?

Abstract: Background Malnutrition is a problem within hospitals, which impacts upon clinical outcomes. The present audit assesses whether a hospital menu meets the energy and protein standards recommended by the British Dietetic Association's (BDA) Nutrition and Hydration Digest and determines the contribution of oral nutrition supplements (ONS) and additional snacks. Methods Patients in a UK South West hospital were categorised as ‘nutritionally well’ or ‘nutritionally vulnerable’ in accordance with their Malnutrition … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
38
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Much remains to be learned about the correct interpretation or use of new REE equations in the noncritical hospitalised patient. This is consistent with the results obtained in the other study showing that the recommended energy of most patients failed to meet recommended nutrient standards (23) . It is likely that this problem is not unique to this hospital.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Much remains to be learned about the correct interpretation or use of new REE equations in the noncritical hospitalised patient. This is consistent with the results obtained in the other study showing that the recommended energy of most patients failed to meet recommended nutrient standards (23) . It is likely that this problem is not unique to this hospital.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This finding is important as hospitals continue to investigate strategies to assist patients to maximise their intake, with poor food intake being recognised as a risk factor for negative and costly clinical and hospital outcomes . These strategies usually focus on individual points in the foodservice process such as menu quality and supplementation , menu choice , meal environment , and ordering and delivery processes . RS delivers on all of these strategies, providing a wide range of high nutritional quality menu items at flexible times throughout the day via an engaging patient‐centric ordering process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having the ability to order food at times that suit their appetite and clinical schedule may improve both intake and satisfaction with the meal service . The provision of regular hospital snacks also comprises a strategy used for patients who prefer to eat little and often and a lack of hospital snack provision has been identified as an inhibitory factor of optimal nutrition . The order on‐demand nature of RS allows for this, with no limit on number of times that patients can order throughout the day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing nutritional intake against individual requirements in addition to the Digest standards increases the strength of the present audit by providing a more thorough assessment of nutritional adequacy in hospitals . Building on previous evidence , the Digest energy standard for nutritionally well patients appears to be appropriate for this population, given that there was no significant difference between the standard and individual requirements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Percentage of participants meeting the Digest standards for energy and protein: a comparison with the baseline audit .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%