2004
DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2004.825964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Architecture for Mobility and QoS Support in All-IP Wireless Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have adopted the random walk mobility model [9] to characterize the movement of the 6LoWPAN MR. Table 4 shows the parameters used in the analysis and their typical values. The parameter values for the analysis are referenced from [10]- [14].…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have adopted the random walk mobility model [9] to characterize the movement of the 6LoWPAN MR. Table 4 shows the parameters used in the analysis and their typical values. The parameter values for the analysis are referenced from [10]- [14].…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distance between MR and GW, and between GW and HA in hops, respectively ts Time to configure/process a signaling message (1 ms) [13] tr Routing-table look-up and processing time for a packet in every hop (0.001 ms) [14] Px IP packet length of a signaling message x…”
Section: Hpan Hgw_hamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Lo et al (2004), a mobility and QoS architecture is proposed for all-IP based 4 G wireless networks. It takes advantage of the two-layer hierarchical structure of IDMP mobility management to reduce the resource reservation delay due to RSVP reestablishment after handoff.…”
Section: Qos Provisioning Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [4] and [16] propose reserving resources in order to support QoS because inaccurate resource estimation due to dynamic load patterns and/or mobility can lead to inefficiencies. Instead of reserving resources, the authors in [5] propose congestion control policies that reduce the impact of congestion in a best-effort IP RAN, thereby allowing adequate QoS support to be maintained.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%