2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2009.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Architectural analysis, viability assessment and growth kinetics of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata biofilms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
99
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
99
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with others researches, mature biofilms of C. albicans consisted of a dense network of yeast and hyphal elements (Chandra et al 2001, Ramage et al 2001, Seneviratne et al 2009). Mature biofilms of C. parapsilosis are structurally similar to those described by Kuhn et al (2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In agreement with others researches, mature biofilms of C. albicans consisted of a dense network of yeast and hyphal elements (Chandra et al 2001, Ramage et al 2001, Seneviratne et al 2009). Mature biofilms of C. parapsilosis are structurally similar to those described by Kuhn et al (2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…7 In addition, biofilm formation and coaggregation effects allow competing microorganisms to maximize the colonization surface area in an environment that is highly competitive for space and nutrients. 23 To date, most previous studies have focused on analyzing biofilm formation by counting CFU/mL; however, Seneviratne et al 10 suggest that biofilm development results should be analyzed by more than one method. In this study, in addition to colony counting, we used an XTT reduction assay that permits measurement of the metabolic activity of the microbial eukaryotic population present in biofilms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 The single biofilms formed by C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, and C. krusei, on flat-bottom 96-well microtiter plates for 48 h, showed similar metabolic activity, thus confirming the CFU counting method. Seneviratne et al 10 evaluated the growth kinetics of Candida biofilms by counting CFU after 1.5, 24, 48 and 72 h of development. At an adherence time of 1.5 h, approximately 1-7 x 10 5 cells/mL had adhered to the well of the microtiter plate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations