2018
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities associated with two dominant species differ in their responses to long‐term nitrogen addition in temperate grasslands

Abstract: Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are important components of grassland ecosystems and are sensitive to enhanced atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition. Enhanced N deposition has been widely reported to reduce species richness and alter species composition across different types of grasslands world‐wide. Despite extensive studies on effects of N deposition on AM fungal communities of grasslands, few studies have specifically focused on effects of N deposition on AM fungi associated with dominant species in grassl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(163 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Limitation of C supply to the AMF may intensify the competition among species (Johnson et al ., 2015). This, in turn, may lead to a loss of some fungal species and promote the dominance of certain AMF species (Johnson, 1993; Dumbrell et al ., 2010; Johnson, 2010; Johnson et al ., 2015; Zheng et al ., 2018). Second, nutrient addition affects mycorrhizal–plant trading partnerships, which are based upon the exchange of host plant C for phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) (Johnson, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitation of C supply to the AMF may intensify the competition among species (Johnson et al ., 2015). This, in turn, may lead to a loss of some fungal species and promote the dominance of certain AMF species (Johnson, 1993; Dumbrell et al ., 2010; Johnson, 2010; Johnson et al ., 2015; Zheng et al ., 2018). Second, nutrient addition affects mycorrhizal–plant trading partnerships, which are based upon the exchange of host plant C for phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) (Johnson, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from field studies have, however, been much more variable. Although combination of high N and P often suppresses AMF, positive (Krashevska, Sandmann, Maraun, & Scheu, 2014; Treseder & Allen, 2002), negative (Jiang et al., 2018; Johnson, Wilson, Wilson, Miller, & Bowker, 2015; Treseder & Allen, 2002) and neutral (Camenzind et al., 2014; Zheng et al., 2018) effects of N or P inputs have been documented in different studies. Indeed, positive, negative and neutral N effects on AMF were observed in five different (mesic to semi‐arid) grasslands in a same study (Egerton‐Warburton, Johnson, & Allen, 2007; Johnson, Rowland, Corkidi, Egerton‐Warburton, & Allen, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AMF responses to nutrient additions have been understood in the context of the cost–benefit of host plants as plant C allocation to AMF is likely dictated by the Law of Minimum (Johnson et al., 2015). Consequently, availability of soil N relative to P, or the N:P stoichiometry for host plant, has been identified as the important determinant for AMF responses to nutrient inputs (Johnson, 2010; Johnson et al., 2015; Zheng et al., 2018). A couple of predictions can thus be derived: N addition to a P‐limiting soil would increase AMF, but to a P‐rich soil would decrease AMF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking consideration of AMF in widescale agricultural management decisions requires changes in current practice, although it has been argued that sufficient data corroborating the nutritional benefit of AMF in agricultural crops to warrant these shifts are currently lacking (Rillig et al, ; Ryan & Graham, ). A prevailing assertion is that cereals are generally negatively or neutrally affected by AMF colonization (Rillig et al, ; Smith & Smith, ); the fungi are assumed to offer little nutritional benefit to plants selectively bred for fine and dense root architecture optimized for nutrient‐acquisition efficiency, especially under high‐nutrient environments (Smith & Smith, ; Wen et al, ; Zheng et al, ). Despite two meta‐analyses suggesting an overall benefit of AMF to crop nutrient uptake and grain yield (Lekberg & Koide, ; Zhang, Lehmann, Zheng, You, & Rillig, ), a sceptical view remains in the literature with regard to the utility of AMF in modern and future agriculture (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%