2009
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.412.33
View full text | Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: From an environmental, safety and economic perspective water should be the solvent of choice for electrophoretic deposition under industrial circumstances. However, because of the electrolytic decomposition of water under the influence of direct current, the majority of EPD is carried out in non-aqueous solvents. In this work, experiments prove that deposits can be obtained from aqueous alumina suspensions while avoiding electrolysis of the medium by using unbalanced alternating current fields [1]. In addition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main issue with DC-EPD is hydrolysis of water occur with potential difference higher than 10 V [21][22][23][24]. The formation of the air bubbles increased as the deposition time and the voltage applied increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main issue with DC-EPD is hydrolysis of water occur with potential difference higher than 10 V [21][22][23][24]. The formation of the air bubbles increased as the deposition time and the voltage applied increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This bubble formation can affect the deposition quality. However, recently good quality deposition is also obtained in aqueous medium under AC and pulsed DC electric field . Such a deposition technique is gaining growing interest to fabricate dense electrolyte or porous electrode for SOFC because of several advantages such as easy control of thickness, short deposition time, low equipment cost, ability to form both dense and porous thin/thick film, uniform deposition on any complex shape, and easy to scale‐up for mass production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neirinck et al [37] suggest that the electrochemical decomposition of water is a sluggish process and that frequencies of 50 Hz are sufficient to stop the reaction from happening. The deposits made using this were free of pores caused by bubble formation (Figure 2.9).…”
Section: Monolithic Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Page | 18 Another solution to the gas formation problem was discovered by Neirinck et al [37] An unbalanced alternating current was used instead of the traditional DC current that is used in most setups. Neirinck et al [37] suggest that the electrochemical decomposition of water is a sluggish process and that frequencies of 50 Hz are sufficient to stop the reaction from happening.…”
Section: Monolithic Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%