2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85451-7_99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximating the Traffic Grooming Problem with Respect to ADMs and OADMs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Appendix we give a 2-approximation algorithm for instances where any two intervals intersect. While an algorithm with the same approximation ratio was given in [7], the present algorithm as well as the analysis are different. We believe it may find uses in solving our problem for other subclasses of instances.…”
Section: Our Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Appendix we give a 2-approximation algorithm for instances where any two intervals intersect. While an algorithm with the same approximation ratio was given in [7], the present algorithm as well as the analysis are different. We believe it may find uses in solving our problem for other subclasses of instances.…”
Section: Our Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In their paper, the problem is called real-time scheduling. 7 The bound of four for these algorithms is tight, as shown in the Appendix B.…”
Section: Definition 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this version of the problem the paper gives a 4-approximation algorithm for general inputs and better bounds for some subclasses of inputs. In particular, the paper presents a 2-approximation algorithm for instances where no interval is properly contained in another (i.e., the input forms a proper interval graph), and a (2 + ε)-approximation for bounded lengths instances, i.e., the length (or, processing time) of any job is bounded by some fixed integer d. ‡ A 2-approximation algorithm was given in [9] for instances where any two intervals intersect, i.e., the input forms a clique (see also in [10]). In this paper we improve and extend the results of [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%