2016
DOI: 10.1080/19386362.2016.1144338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate equations for the method of fragment

Abstract: The method of fragment is a simple and approximate technique for solving confined seepage flow problems. In this method, the flow domain is divided into few fragments along the equipotential lines that are assumed to be vertical and a dimensionless form factor is defined for each fragment. The flow rate and the exit hydraulic gradient can be computed using the form factors. Griffiths proposed three types of fragments that are adequate to solve most configurations, incorporating anisotropy in permeability, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies that make direct use of the group obtained in the previous section from the general discrimination are scarce. It is worth mentioning the work of Madanayaka and Sivakugan 24 for the study of two‐dimensional (confined flow) seepage axisymmetric cofferdam problems using the method of fragments 25 . Using classic arguments based on merely dimensional analysis and from the list of relevant variables of the problem, these authors choose two dimensionless groups consistent with those obtained in the previous section.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies that make direct use of the group obtained in the previous section from the general discrimination are scarce. It is worth mentioning the work of Madanayaka and Sivakugan 24 for the study of two‐dimensional (confined flow) seepage axisymmetric cofferdam problems using the method of fragments 25 . Using classic arguments based on merely dimensional analysis and from the list of relevant variables of the problem, these authors choose two dimensionless groups consistent with those obtained in the previous section.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%