2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.crme.2004.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approche globale, minima relatifs et Critère d'Amorçage en Mécanique de la Rupture

Abstract: On montre que l'on peut rendre compte de l'amorçage d'une fissure en utilisant uniquement la notion de minimum relatif de l'énergie globale, les critères d'amorçage obtenus dépendant du choix de la forme de l'énergie. En particulier dans le cas d'une énergie de volume élastique et d'une énergie de surface dépendant du saut de déplacement, le critère d'amorçage obtenu est un critère en contraintes du type courbe intrinsèque.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it has become necessary to introduce additional criteria to select physically realistic solutions. In the spirit of Nguyen (2000), recent variational approaches (Charlotte et al 2000;Laverne and Marigo 2004;Mielke 2005;Charlotte et al 2006;Bourdin et al 2008) propose to reinforce usual stationary conditions with a stability condition. Making a full use of the justification of such an energetic approach given by Marigo (1989Marigo ( , 2000, see also DeSimone et al (2001), Pham and Marigo (2010a,b) introduced this stability criterion as one of the three principles (along with irreversibility and energy balance) that governs the evolution of damage in a body.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it has become necessary to introduce additional criteria to select physically realistic solutions. In the spirit of Nguyen (2000), recent variational approaches (Charlotte et al 2000;Laverne and Marigo 2004;Mielke 2005;Charlotte et al 2006;Bourdin et al 2008) propose to reinforce usual stationary conditions with a stability condition. Making a full use of the justification of such an energetic approach given by Marigo (1989Marigo ( , 2000, see also DeSimone et al (2001), Pham and Marigo (2010a,b) introduced this stability criterion as one of the three principles (along with irreversibility and energy balance) that governs the evolution of damage in a body.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In itself, FFM does not reduce to a criterion on stress in the absence of stress concentration. To capture yield failure, the variational approach of Francfort and Marigo (1998) has been combined with cohesive zone interfaces instead of a Griffith (infinitely thin) surface (Laverne and Marigo, 2004;Charlotte et al, 2006;Bourdin et al, 2008), thus offering a more general application of CZM since the path of initiated crack is no more needed a priori. Another approach has been proposed by Leguillon (2002) to capture yield failure in FFM, the application of which is simpler than cohezive zone interfaces since it relies on a linear elastic calculation only: failure occurs if the energy criterion of FFM is satisfied and if the yield failure criterion is verified along the path of the initiated finite crack.…”
Section: Theories Of Initiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result can be extended to a general three-dimensional setting via the same stability criterion. In particular, assuming that the material is isotropic and hence that the surface energy density is only a function of the normal displacement jump and of the norm of the tangential displacement jump across the crack lips, i.e., Φ(JuK • n, JuK − (JuK • n) n ), where n denotes the local unit normal vector to the crack, it is stated in [23] and proved in [9] that the crack nucleation criterion takes the form of an intrinsic curve in the Mohr stress plane which involves the directional derivatives at (0, 0) of Φ. Furthermore, when Φ admits partial derivatives at (0, 0), the nucleation criterion simply reduces to the two usual criteria of maximal shear stress and maximal tensile stress.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%