We present a transcriptomic analysis aimed at investigating whether the changes in gene expression that occur under inbreeding generally reduce or enhance inbreeding depression. Discerning between these two alternatives can be addressed only when both changes in expression due to inbreeding and to inbreeding depression are estimated simultaneously. We used Affymetrix 2.0 arrays to study the changes in gene expression associated with both inbreeding and inbreeding depression for fitness in four sets of inbred sublines of Drosophila melanogaster. We found that for most genes showing changes in expression associated with inbreeding, the least depressed sublines were those showing the largest departures in expression from that of the outbred control. This suggests a pattern consistent with a protective role of expression changes against inbreeding effects, and would reveal a new dimension of the transcriptomics of inbreeding. The variation in depression observed could then be due not only to the genetic damages primarily originating that depression, but also possibly to differences in the ability to carry out the appropriate adjustments in gene expression to cope with the inbreeding. We also found that these expression changes with a putative protective role against inbreeding effects show a clear specificity on RNA synthesis and splicing and energy derivation functions.
INBREEDING depression, the reduction in fitness observed in the progeny of genetically related individuals, plays a key role in population biology, affecting processes as diverse as the management of livestock and endangered wild species (Keller and Waller 2002;Koenig and Simianer 2006), the evolution of mating systems (Kelly 2005), and the dispersal strategies (Motro 1991;Gandon 1999). The population genetics of this depression is well understood (Lynch 1991;Charlesworth and Charlesworth 1999;Charlesworth and Willis 2009), but the genomic details about the mechanisms causing it are just starting to be unveiled (Paige 2010). In particular, it would be important to determine the relationship between gene regulation and inbreeding, as regulatory variation underlies much of phenotypic diversity (Wilson et al. 1974;Carroll 2005;Ranz and Machado 2006). Evidence has been provided for significant intraspecific variation in transcript abundance for a large fraction of the genome (Primig et al. 2000;Sandberg et al. 2000) and to show that much of such variation is heritable (Cavalieri et al. 2000;Karp et al. 2000;Jin et al. 2001), suggesting that regulatory variation is likely the main mediator of phenotypic divergence in evolution (King and Wilson 1975;Wray et al. 2003;Hoekstra and Coyne 2007). Therefore, genetic correlations between expression phenotypes and organismal phenotypes point to the molecular pathways that underlie the organismal phenotypes (Rockman and Kruglyak 2006). Thus, an understanding of the molecular basis of inbreeding depression requires knowledge of variation at the whole-genome level (Ayroles et al.
2009).Using whole-genome cD...