2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.11.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches for coupling solid-phase microextraction to nanospray

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As recently reviewed, [5] different geometries of SPME have been coupled to direct analysis in real time (DART), desorption electrospray ionization (DESI), surface-enhanced laser desorption-ionization (SELDI), and matrix-assisted laser desorptionionization (MALDI) in a broad range of applications. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] We report herein the development of a novel SPME configuration that allows its use, without further modifications, as an ambient ionization method for mass spectrometry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As recently reviewed, [5] different geometries of SPME have been coupled to direct analysis in real time (DART), desorption electrospray ionization (DESI), surface-enhanced laser desorption-ionization (SELDI), and matrix-assisted laser desorptionionization (MALDI) in a broad range of applications. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] We report herein the development of a novel SPME configuration that allows its use, without further modifications, as an ambient ionization method for mass spectrometry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea was further explored, and recent results showed that an appropriately designed and developed SPME device can give limits of detection in the low pg mL −1 level in biological matrices, with a total analysis time (from sample preparation to result) of less than 3 min per sample for SPME-DART (Direct Analysis in Real Time) [91] and Coated Blade Spray (CBS) [92]. While direct coupling of SPME fibers to MS through the use of nanoelectrospray technology was first proposed in 2005 by Walles et al [93], recent modifications of the interface followed by method optimization have enabled for stable desorption conditions to be achieved with similar detection as previous approaches [94]. The given examples of direct SPME-MS couplings with both lab-made and commercially available devices show the enormous potential of the method for point-of-care and on-site diagnostics.…”
Section: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Point-of-care and On-site Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This desorption mode is a necessity for liquid-phase separations; most commonly used for non-volatiles, thermally labile compounds and biomolecules [24]. Previous studies have shown promise for the direct coupling of SPME to nanoelectrospray ionization [25,26], the nanospray solvent effectively desorbing the SPME device. More recently, nanomaterial-based TF-SPME devices have been simultaneously desorbed and analyzed by total reflection X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (TXRF) [27,28] which can be applied to both the analysis of organic compounds and metals.…”
Section: Types Of Desorption Modes For Tf-spmementioning
confidence: 99%