2002
DOI: 10.1109/tsmcc.2002.1009117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approach by localization and multiobjective evolutionary optimization for flexible job-shop scheduling problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
356
0
10

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 638 publications
(400 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
356
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison is made among our algorithm and the other two well known algorithms, that is, Kacem et al [10]. and Ho et al [11].…”
Section: Test Sample ιmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The comparison is made among our algorithm and the other two well known algorithms, that is, Kacem et al [10]. and Ho et al [11].…”
Section: Test Sample ιmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first test sample comes from [10]. The comparison is made among our algorithm and the other two well known algorithms, that is, Kacem et al [10].…”
Section: Test Sample ιmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The multiple resource constrained JSSP or multiple processor task JSSP, in turn, requires that an operation be processed simultaneously on two or more resources (Brucker andKramer 1996 andFredendall et al 1996). Finally, the flexible job shop scheduling problem (FJSP) incorporates the allocation of operations to resources into the optimization process (Gao et al 2006;Kacem et al 2002a;and Xia and Wu 2005).…”
Section: The Problem Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, apart from the PSO-SA hybrid of Xia and Wu (2005), all the algorithms make use of a two-part particle representation and resource allocation is addressed by means of rounding off the continuous PSO particle dimensions to the nearest integer value representing a resource index. Secondly, the largest problem attempted by any of these PSO-based algorithms only consider the scheduling of 56 operations on at most 15 resources, which is currently considered to be a problem of "great size" in FJSP scheduling literature (Kacem et al 2002a). This paper, on the other hand considers a multi-objective FJSP where the scheduling of up to 256 operations on 216 resources need to be considered.…”
Section: Addressing More Complex Scheduling Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%