Applying Step Coverability Trees to Communicating Component-Based Systems

Abstract

Like reachability, coverability is an important tool for verifying behavioural properties of dynamic systems. When a system is modelled as a Petri net, the classical Karp-Miller coverability tree construction can be used to decide questions related to the (required) capacity of local states. Correctness (termination) of the construction is based on a monotonicity property: more resources available implies more behaviour possible. Here we discuss a modification of the coverability tree construction allowing one to deal with concurrent occurrences of actions (steps) and to extend the notion of coverability to a dynamic action-based notion (thus viewing bandwidth as a resource). We are in particular interested in component-based systems in which steps are subject to additional constraints like (local) synchronicity or maximal concurrency. In general the behaviour of such systems is not monotonous and hence new termination criteria (depending on the step semantics) are needed. We here investigate marked graphs, a Petri net model for systems consisting of concurrent components communicating via buffers. AbstractLike reachability, coverability is an important tool for verifying behavioural properties of dynamic systems. When a system is modelled as a Petri net, the classical Karp-Miller coverability tree construction can be used to decide questions related to the (required) capacity of local states. Correctness (termination) of the construction is based on a monotonicity property: more resources available implies more behaviour possible. Here we discuss a modification of the coverability tree construction allowing one to deal with concurrent occurrences of actions (steps) and to extend the notion of coverability to a dynamic action-based notion (thus viewing bandwidth as a resource). We are in particular interested in component-based systems in which steps are subject to additional constraints like (local) synchronicity or maximal concurrency. In general the behaviour of such systems is not monotonous and hence new termination criteria (depending on the step semantics) are needed. We here investigate marked graphs, a Petri net model for systems consisting of concurrent components communicating via buffers. About the authorJetty Kleijn is a visiting fellow within the School of Computing Science, Newcastle University. MSc (1982) and PhD (1984) Abstract. Like reachability, coverability is an important tool for verifying behavioural properties of dynamic systems. When a system is modelled as a Petri net, the classical Karp-Miller coverability tree construction can be used to decide questions related to the (required) capacity of local states. Correctness (termination) of the construction is based on a monotonicity property: more resources available implies more behaviour possible. Here we discuss a modification of the coverability tree construction allowing one to deal with concurrent occurrences of actions (steps) and to extend the notion of coverability to a dynamic action-based notion (thus viewing bandwidt...