2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-012-0790-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of multi-trait selection in common bean using real and simulated experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, little increase is expected through the use of multivariate analysis. Similar results were found by Balestre et al [8] with common bean.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, little increase is expected through the use of multivariate analysis. Similar results were found by Balestre et al [8] with common bean.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This similarity in the estimates between the two approaches should probably be associated with good experimental precision, observed through selective accuracy and, consequently, through the high estimate of heritability (Table 2). Balestre et al [8] observed that, under high heritability, there is no difference between the multivariate and univariate approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to indirect selection, which may be included in multi-trait models, the inclusion of dominance effects in the model to take advantage of the heterosis phenomenon is another factor that may be used by breeders to increase predictive ability. In the context of the GBLUP model, the inclusion of dominance effects may be easily performed using the kinship matrix including dominance estimated using molecular markers without drastically changing the model size, as would occur in a regression model using markers [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%