2022
DOI: 10.3390/v15010009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Lytic Bacteriophages and Their Enzymes to Reduce Saprophytic Bacteria Isolated from Minimally Processed Plant-Based Food Products—In Vitro Studies

Abstract: The aim of this study was to isolate phage enzymes and apply them in vitro for eradication of the dominant saprophytic bacteria isolated from minimally processed food. Four bacteriophages—two Enterobacter-specific and two Serratia-specific, which produce lytic enzymes—were used in this research. Two methods of phage enzyme isolation were tested, namely precipitation with acetone and ultracentrifugation. It was found that the number of virions could be increased almost 100 times due to the extension of the cult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EPS depolymerases are believed to be effective in dispersing biofilms [ 40 ]. Photos of phage plaques on bacterial lawn, the procedure for isolating bacteriophage enzymes, and assessing their impact on limiting bacterial growth were described in an earlier article by Shymialevich et al [ 41 ]. The morphology of the isolated bacteriophages was visualized by TEM, and the electron micrographs are shown in Figure 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EPS depolymerases are believed to be effective in dispersing biofilms [ 40 ]. Photos of phage plaques on bacterial lawn, the procedure for isolating bacteriophage enzymes, and assessing their impact on limiting bacterial growth were described in an earlier article by Shymialevich et al [ 41 ]. The morphology of the isolated bacteriophages was visualized by TEM, and the electron micrographs are shown in Figure 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four of the phages studied (i.e., Enterobacter phage KKP 3262 against Enterobacter cloacae strain KKP 3082, Enterobacter phage KKP 3263 against Enterobacter ludwigii strain KKP 3083, Serratia phage KKP 3264 against Serratia fonticola strain KKP 3084, and Citrobacter phage KKP 3664 against Citrobacter freundii strain KKP 3655) were comprehensively characterized in our previous study [ 20 ], and genome sequences have been deposited in the GenBank database under the accession numbers OK210076, OK210074, OK210077, and OK210075, respectively. In addition, another three enzyme-producing phages (i.e., Serratia phage KKP 3708 against Serratia liquefaciens strain KKP 3654, Serratia phage KKP 3709 against Serratia marcescens strain KKP 3687, and Enterobacter phage KKP 3711 against Enterobacter cloacae strain KKP 3684) were described by Shymialevich et al [ 71 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%