2020
DOI: 10.1186/s40643-020-00350-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of gene expression programming, artificial neural network and multilinear regression in predicting hydrochar physicochemical properties

Abstract: Globally, the provision of energy is becoming an absolute necessity. Biomass resources are abundant and have been described as a potential alternative source of energy. However, it is important to assess the fuel characteristics of the various available biomass sources. Soft computing techniques are presented in this study to predict the mass yield (MY), energy yield (EY), and higher heating value (HHV) of hydrothermally carbonized biomass using Gene Expression Programming (GEP), multiple-input single output-a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ANN learns from a given example and applies the residual knowledge to future prediction. This tool has been used in solving various complex engineering problems as indicated by Lawal and Kwon, 34 Onifade et al, 35 Abdulsalam et al, 37 Akinwekomi and Lawal, 38 etc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ANN learns from a given example and applies the residual knowledge to future prediction. This tool has been used in solving various complex engineering problems as indicated by Lawal and Kwon, 34 Onifade et al, 35 Abdulsalam et al, 37 Akinwekomi and Lawal, 38 etc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GEP was developed by Ferreira [34] and has gained popularity in most geoengineering publications [35][36][37]. The GEP analyses were performed using GeneXproTools.…”
Section: Gene Expression Programming (Gep)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models were developed using primary data that involved operational parameters (e.g., temperature, residence time, biomass/water ratio) for multiple feedstocks (organic municipal solid waste, agricultural and forestry residue). When compared with ML methods developed with secondary data, predictive performance of MLR models was lower than that of ANN, RT, , and RFR . Among the applications of ML methods, hydrothermal treatment processes were modeled by applying ANN using secondary data, and RFR using both primary and secondary data.…”
Section: Applications Of Data Science In Rrcc From Organic Waste Streamsmentioning
confidence: 99%