2017
DOI: 10.21608/epsj.2017.5380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Flashed Lighting Program in Naked Neck Chickens (Sharkasi) Management

Abstract: The present study was undertaken to investigate the effect of application flash lighting program on performance and physiological status of naked neck chickens. Three hundred and sixty, four weeks old birds were randomly distributed into 6 experimental groups (3 replicates of 20 birds each) and housed in floor pens. The first group (control group, C), birds were maintained under 12 hrs and 16 hrs common light (CL) per day during the growing and laying periods, respectively. While, in the other groups, birds we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Farghly et al [45] found that no significant differences were observed for all blood parameters of flash lighting treated chickens and those of the control. Furthermore, Farghly M et al [46] found that there was no change in plasma total protein, total lipids, cholesterol, and liver function enzymes as affected by lighting periods.…”
Section: Blood Biochemical Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Farghly et al [45] found that no significant differences were observed for all blood parameters of flash lighting treated chickens and those of the control. Furthermore, Farghly M et al [46] found that there was no change in plasma total protein, total lipids, cholesterol, and liver function enzymes as affected by lighting periods.…”
Section: Blood Biochemical Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies from across the world and in recent times have reported that when layer hens of appropriate genetics (Küçükyilmaz et al, 2012) are fed appropriate quantities and quality of feed at the correct age and housed at optimum temperatures and humidity, and are allowed appropriate photoperiod, they produce the highest quantity and best quality of eggs (Farghly et al, 2017;Guo et al, 2019;Idowu et al, 2019;John-Jaja et al, 2016;Sallam et al, 2019). Unfavourable environmental conditions compromise the welfare of laying hens (Janczak and Riber, 2015), and the modern consumer of products of animal origin is increasingly preferring products from animals raised under ideal welfare conditions (Cao et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Layers are photo-stimulated by more than 12 hours of light, regardless of the program of artificial lighting used (Jácome et al, 2014). According to one study involving brown egg-laying breeds, interrupted lighting regimes totalling as low as 4hr (Han et al, 2017) of total light per day or delivered as flash lights (Farghly et al, 2017) were sufficient to maintain satisfactory egg production when compared to the traditional 14hr/day lighting regime (Skoglund and Whittaker, 1980). However, Lohmann Tierzucht recommend that about 12-14 hours of lighting is sufficient for top egg production in Lohmann Brown layers (Lohmann Tierzucht, 2018b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mixing photo and scoto -periods within 24 hours) rather than one continuous photoperiod have been proven to significantly improve broilers' carcass yield. Farghly et al, (2017) reported that light flashes program significantly improved carcass dressing percentage, breast percentage and abdominal fat percentage. Metwally et al, (2015) reported that light type significantly affected carcass traits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Also, changes were not observed in spleen percentage of the broilers reared under the different lighting programs. Farghly et al, (2017) reported that light flashes program has insignificant effect in drumstick, femur, liver, heart and gizzard . Okafor and Kalio (2017) reported that there was a significant difference in the weight of the gizzards at the 80% and 100% inclusion levels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%