2014
DOI: 10.1080/00220973.2013.876231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling to Evaluate the Academic Motivation Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
185
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
22
185
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In response to the proposed objective, the instrument's psychometric properties were examined in a sample of pre-service teachers. In accordance with the results of previous research (Barkoukis et al, 2008;Guay, Morin, Litalien, Valois, & Vallerand, 2015;Núñez et al, 2010;Stover et al, 2012), the confirmatory factorial analysis, conducted to provide evidence of validity based on internal structure, considered the factor correlated model originally proposed by Vallerand et al (1989), as well as, different alternative models that could be supported by the SDT postulates. Furthermore, the instrument's invariance across gender, its internal consistency and temporal stability were analysed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In response to the proposed objective, the instrument's psychometric properties were examined in a sample of pre-service teachers. In accordance with the results of previous research (Barkoukis et al, 2008;Guay, Morin, Litalien, Valois, & Vallerand, 2015;Núñez et al, 2010;Stover et al, 2012), the confirmatory factorial analysis, conducted to provide evidence of validity based on internal structure, considered the factor correlated model originally proposed by Vallerand et al (1989), as well as, different alternative models that could be supported by the SDT postulates. Furthermore, the instrument's invariance across gender, its internal consistency and temporal stability were analysed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In contrast, these same studies show that the free estimation of cross-loadings, even when none are present in the population model, still provides unbiased estimates of the factor correlations (also see Asparouhov, Muthén, & Morin, 2015;. Importantly, recent studies also conducted on motivational data have also shown the clear advantages of using ESEM (Guay, Morin, Litalien, Valois, & Vallerand, 2015;. Furthermore, it is now possible to rely on a confirmatory approach to the estimation of EFA/ESEM models though the use of target rotation Browne, 2001).…”
Section: Preliminary Measurement Models and Tests Of Measurement Invamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to this conception, correlations between measures of behavioural regulations should exhibit a simplex pattern whereby motivation types more proximally located on the continuum are more strongly associated than with those more distally located. In fact, such SDT-based measures often do not conform to this pattern (Guay, Morin, Litalien, Valois, & Vallerand, 2015). Chemolli and Gagné (2014) argued that the continuum conception, with the regulatory types ordered along a single dimension representing individual differences in autonomy, is not consistent with the idea that the forms of regulation described by SDT are qualitatively different, nor with the fact that individuals can endorse more than one form of regulation for a behaviour at the same time.…”
Section: Self-determination Theorymentioning
confidence: 96%