Appearances of Disability and Christianity in Uganda

Abstract


 This article considers how Christianity contributes to the appearance of cognitive disability in Uganda, a country with some of the most progressive disability policies in the world but little in the way of formal care and advocacy for cognitively disabled people. As a point of departure, the article invokes Hannah Arendt’s notion of appearance as a way to thematize the importance of public display in Ugandan social life, as well as the challenge that people with evidently profound disabilities pose to Ugandan social aesthetics. It first traces how cognitive disability disappears under the liberal logics that organize Uganda’s secular disability laws and activism, and then compares the ways that Catholic and Pentecostal efforts sustain the appearance of cognitive disability, in light of their theological differences and their common paternalism. Even as Christian paternalism in the face of cognitive disability may prove repugnant to a liberal vision of disability politics, I argue that it sustains a form of disability appearance otherwise not possible in Uganda.
 
 Bufunze
 
 Ekiwandiiko kino kilagira ddala bulungi, nga obukristaayo bwe bwewaddeyo ennyo ku nsonga etekwatiddwa bulungi ey’endabika y’abantu abalina obulemu mu butesobola nga buva ku bwongo nga bali mu Uganda. Eggwanga erya Uganda lirina enkola ennungi mu byokwezza obuggya ku nsonga y’abantu abo munsi yonna. Wabula ate kinakuwaza nnyo, nti libulamu nnyo enkola ennungamu mu ngeri y’okuwagira endabirira esaanidde abantu abo, mu mbeera zaabwe zonna okutwalira awamu. Ekiwandiiko kino okwawukana ku bya bulijjo ebirala byonna, kikoona butereevu ku ndowooza ya Hannah Arendt, era nga kirina n’okulaga okusomooza okuleteddwaawo obutafa bulungi ku bantu abo mu mbeera zaabwe mu ggwanga lyonna. Ekiwandiiko kisookera ddala n’okulaga engeri y’okufaayo ku nsonga eyo bwe kigenda kisaanirawo ddala nga kino kiyita mu kwekkiriranya abantu kwe batambuliramu ng’abakweyambisa, nga bakola amateeka agakwata ku butesobola obw’obwongo, wamu nebirala ebikolebwa okukisaamu amaanyi, Kati ekyo, nga bwe twongerako netukigeerageeranya n’ekyo ekikolebwa abakatuliki n’aba Pentekooti ku nsonga eyo yemu mu kuyimirizaawo endabika entuufu eyandisaanidde ku bantu abo abalina obulemu bwobutesobola. Naye ate olwokuberawo enjawukana z’e byeddini wakati waabo bombi, nekitasobola kutambula bulungi, nga kino kiva mu kugaaana okukolera awamu nga abantu abali ku mulimu ogumu. Ekisinga obukulu nga kyekireeeta obutakkanya obwo kyangu okulaba. Kale obutasobola kukolera wamu olw’obukulu bwensonga eyo, nakyo kiyinza okuva ku bukyaayi okwesigamiziddwa ku kwolesebwa okulina obulemu mu bwongo, mu nfuga yaabwo egobererwa. Ekyo ne kiyimirizaawo endabika eyobulemu obutesobola era nga nayo tesoboka mu Uganda kukolebwako.

Disability Expertise

“…I use the phrase "apparent disability" to mean those disabilities that are observable by others, as an alternative to "visible disability" (which is ocular-centric). "Apparent" also dovetails with theorizations of disability appearance in relational interactions (see Titchkosky 2011;Zoanni 2019).…”

“…Disability, as a category, is real: it does things in the world. This is so even as some interlocutors may refuse to identify themselves with the category, and even though the ways in which the category of disability "appears" may differ from one context or field site to another, or between interlocutors in the same field site (Titchkosky 2011;Zoanni 2019). This is the crux of disability anthropology: asking, What does the category of disability do?…”

Disability and technology in Africa: introduction

“…More recently, researchers have examined how political economy, historical changes and disability policy are relevant for disabled people in local worlds (Livingston 2005;Muyinda and Whyte 2011;Berghs 2016;Swartz 2014;Devlieger 2018a;2018b;Chataika 2018). They are exploring the life worlds of disabled people with insight and sensitivity (Silva 2015;Zoanni 2019;Mildner 2021;Modern 2022).…”

Intercorporeal Togetherness: On Russian Blind Activists’ Technology of Disability Inclusion

“…Personal appearance is rarely, if ever, a private matter, especially for people with disabilities whose ability to appear aesthetically pleasant often acts as a marker of their social competence and worth (Hammer 2019; Zoanni 2019). In this sense, for people with disabilities, the stakes of making a positive impression in public transcend specific instances.…”