2014
DOI: 10.7773/cm.v40i3.2427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Apparent digestibility of dry matter, crude protein, and amino acids of six rendered by-products in juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Apparent digestibility coefficients (ADC) of dry matter, crude protein (CP), and amino acids (AA) were evaluated in diets with six rendered by-products used to feed juvenile Pacific white shrimp: two poultry meals (poultry meal 1, 69% CP; poultry meal 2, 72% CP), two feather meals (89% CP), one blood meal (96% CP), and one pork meal (57% CP). Experimental diets were formulated with 30% of the test ingredient and 70% of a commercial diet supplemented with 1% of chromium oxide as inert marker. AA conte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Lee and Lawrence [22] that the digestibility of crude protein shrimp is quite high if more than 80%. The highest protein digestibility value in the study of79.51%, this value is lower than 84% protein digestibility in juvenile vannamei shrimp produced [23]; and different in feed ingredients [24]. The value of the resulting total digestibility is 79.50%, the lowest in the digestibility total, protein, fat, carbohydrates and fiber digestibility in juvenile vannamei shrimp fed with 100% substitution of tofu and fermented vegetable waste 0%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…According to Lee and Lawrence [22] that the digestibility of crude protein shrimp is quite high if more than 80%. The highest protein digestibility value in the study of79.51%, this value is lower than 84% protein digestibility in juvenile vannamei shrimp produced [23]; and different in feed ingredients [24]. The value of the resulting total digestibility is 79.50%, the lowest in the digestibility total, protein, fat, carbohydrates and fiber digestibility in juvenile vannamei shrimp fed with 100% substitution of tofu and fermented vegetable waste 0%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…It is likely that pork by-product meals may have been less digestible for charr than F1 and the poultry by-product feeds as indicated by their higher FCR. Lower digestibility of pork than poultry by-product meals was recently reported in a feeding study on Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) [24]. It is also Feeds possible that other unidentified ingredients in pork by-product meals caused lower weight gain because charr feeding on F5 (vegetable feed by-products) had similar FCR as F3 and F4, yet higher weight gain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Considerando lo anterior, existen muchos estudios sobre la digestibilidad aparente de nutrientes en camarones. En algunos de ellos se considera la lixiviación de nutrientes en los pellets para ajustar los coeficientes de digestibilidad aparente (Ricque et al, 2006;Cruz-Suárez et al, 2009;Nieto-López et al, 2011, Villarreal-Cavazos et al, 2014. Sin embargo, en términos de lixiviación de nutrientes en las heces y con ajustes en los cálculos de digestibilidad aparente, sólo existen dos estudios: Fenucci et al (1982) realizaron el primero, con camarón azul del Pacífico (Penaeus stylirostris Stimpson, 1874); mientras que el segundo lo llevaron a cabo Smith y Tabrett (2004) con camarón tigre negro (Penaeus monodon Fabricius, 1798).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…1983), y el extracto libre de nitrógeno fue calculado por diferencia. La pérdida de nutrientes en agua marina también se estimó acorde a la técnica reportada porVillarreal-Cavazos et al (2014). El contenido de cromo fue determinado mediante el método descrito porBolin et al (1952), modificado porCruz-Suárez et al (2009).…”
unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation