2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3033661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

APLCNet: Automatic Pixel-Level Crack Detection Network Based on Instance Segmentation

Abstract: The accurate and automatic detection of pavement cracks is essential for pavement maintenance. However, automatic crack detection remains a challenging problem due to the inconspicuous visual features of cracks in complex pavement backgrounds, the complicated shapes and structures of cracks, and the influences of weather changes and noise. In recent years, with the development of artificial intelligence technology, crack detection methods based on classification and semantic segmentation have laid a good found… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through the comprehensive evaluation of the two‐stage network performance in this paper, it is proved that each stage of the network has better detection performance. The proposed method is compared with other excellent crack detection models based on depth learning (Deepcrack [26], FPHBN [29], APLCNet [32], ANet‐FSM [35], HDCB‐Net [36]), the performance and output of the different methods are shown in Figures 14 and 15.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Through the comprehensive evaluation of the two‐stage network performance in this paper, it is proved that each stage of the network has better detection performance. The proposed method is compared with other excellent crack detection models based on depth learning (Deepcrack [26], FPHBN [29], APLCNet [32], ANet‐FSM [35], HDCB‐Net [36]), the performance and output of the different methods are shown in Figures 14 and 15.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al. [32] modify the Mask‐Rcnn [33] network to solve the problem that Mask branches in Mask‐Rcnn cannot predict the details of cracks accurately. In addition to the research on the deep network structure, Li et al.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors of [17] enforce consistency between semantic and instance segmentation masks prediction through a specialized loss construction. In [30], the authors add a semantic segmentation head in Mask R-CNN to uncover fine details in a crack detection setting. All the aforementioned works combine semantic and instance segmentation in a fusion setting, where it is assumed that the combination of the two tasks will facilitate the overall mask predictions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they verified that the U-Net outperformed other existing deep CNNs in terms of robustness, effectiveness, and detection accuracy. Hitherto, both FCNs and U-Nets have been investigated extensively, e.g., the automatic pixel-level crack detection network [26] and the convolutional encoderdecoder network [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%