2017
DOI: 10.1136/vr.104304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial use in food‐producing animals: a rapid evidence assessment of stakeholder practices and beliefs

Abstract: General rightsThis document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 2000s the use of veterinary antimicrobials as growth promoters in the European Union was prohibited (European Parliament and European Council, 2003). However, antimicrobial drugs have continued to be used to counteract endemic or recurrent disease, often in prophylactic and group-medication modes (EFSA, 2011b;Hockenhull et al, 2017;Rhouma, Beaudry, Thériault, & Letellier, 2016). This can lead to poor or increasingly expensive disease control (such as with Brachyspira spp.…”
Section: Introduction Scope and Aims Of The Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 2000s the use of veterinary antimicrobials as growth promoters in the European Union was prohibited (European Parliament and European Council, 2003). However, antimicrobial drugs have continued to be used to counteract endemic or recurrent disease, often in prophylactic and group-medication modes (EFSA, 2011b;Hockenhull et al, 2017;Rhouma, Beaudry, Thériault, & Letellier, 2016). This can lead to poor or increasingly expensive disease control (such as with Brachyspira spp.…”
Section: Introduction Scope and Aims Of The Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significantly, different publics prioritised different risks. This variation of risk perceptions both between nations and between different social groups has been studied intensively by historians and sociologists and strongly impacted antibiotic use and policymaking (SmithHoward, 2010;Morris et al, 2016;Etienne et al, 2017;Hockenhull et al, 2017;Begemann et al, 2018): some countries decided to target antibiotic residues in food and milk, others decided to tackle agricultural AMR selection, and others decided to do nothing at all. Although it is beyond the scope of this paper to reconstruct national case studies in detail, varying risk perceptions, economic imperatives, and local patterns of use had given rise to a global patchwork of antibiotic regulations by the early 1970s.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to notice that there is a variation of risk perceptions both between nations and between different social groups has been studied and it is strongly impacted antibiotic use and policymaking [21,22], in which, some countries decided to target antibiotic residues in food and milk, others decided to tackle agricultural antimicrobial resistance selection, and others decided to do nothing at all [23].…”
Section: Use Of Antibiotics In Animal Production and Its Impact On Humentioning
confidence: 99%