2019
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001860.pub4
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Antibiotics for trachoma

Abstract: Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus control (individuals), Outcome 1 Active trachoma at 3 months. . Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus control (individuals), Outcome 2 Active trachoma at 12 months. . Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus control (individuals), Outcome 3 Active trachoma at 3 months (subgroup

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
22
14
10
2

Citation Types

0
40
0
4

Year Published

Range
2019
2019
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
36
6
4

Relationship

3
43

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 46 publications

(44 citation statements)
references

References 117 publications

0
40
0
4
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Risks for AMR development are not limited to the specific antimicrobial agent used to treat a particular infection, as suggested in a recent revision of a Cochrane systematic review on the mass treatment of trachoma using antibiotics [ 32 ]. Here, evidence shows with high certainty that S. pneumoniae , S. aureus and Escherichia coli exhibited approximately fivefold increase in resistance at 12 months not only to agents used to treat trachoma, namely azithromycin and tetracycline, but also to clindamycin despite having no role in trachoma management [ 32 ]. Likewise, Doan et al [ 25 ] found that beta-lactam resistance determinants were 2.1 times (95% CI 1.2–4.0) higher after mass azithromycin distribution.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%