2019
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Antibiotics for trachoma
Abstract: Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus control (individuals), Outcome 1 Active trachoma at 3 months. . Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus control (individuals), Outcome 2 Active trachoma at 12 months. . Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus control (individuals), Outcome 3 Active trachoma at 3 months (subgroup
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
22
14
10
2
Citation Types
0
40
0
4
Year Published
Range
2019
20192026
2026Publication Types
Select...
36
6
4
Relationship
3
43
Authors
Journals
Cited by 46 publications
(44 citation statements)
References 117 publications
0
40
0
4
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Risks for AMR development are not limited to the specific antimicrobial agent used to treat a particular infection, as suggested in a recent revision of a Cochrane systematic review on the mass treatment of trachoma using antibiotics [ 32 ]. Here, evidence shows with high certainty that S. pneumoniae , S. aureus and Escherichia coli exhibited approximately fivefold increase in resistance at 12 months not only to agents used to treat trachoma, namely azithromycin and tetracycline, but also to clindamycin despite having no role in trachoma management [ 32 ]. Likewise, Doan et al [ 25 ] found that beta-lactam resistance determinants were 2.1 times (95% CI 1.2–4.0) higher after mass azithromycin distribution.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Risks for AMR development are not limited to the specific antimicrobial agent used to treat a particular infection, as suggested in a recent revision of a Cochrane systematic review on the mass treatment of trachoma using antibiotics [ 32 ]. Here, evidence shows with high certainty that S. pneumoniae , S. aureus and Escherichia coli exhibited approximately fivefold increase in resistance at 12 months not only to agents used to treat trachoma, namely azithromycin and tetracycline, but also to clindamycin despite having no role in trachoma management [ 32 ]. Likewise, Doan et al [ 25 ] found that beta-lactam resistance determinants were 2.1 times (95% CI 1.2–4.0) higher after mass azithromycin distribution.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Competition also occurs between hosts: susceptibility and resistance both spill over between populations, with important implications for MDA [ 26 ]. For example, rates of macrolide resistance among S. pneumoniae and E. coli carried by recipients of MDA-azithromycin increase substantially after treatment [ 1 , 27 , 28 ] but then appear to wane in the succeeding months [ 29 , 30 ]. Although this waning could be partly due to intra-individual effects, population-level effects likely play an important role: susceptible strains in untreated individuals can be transmitted to antibiotic-treated individuals [ 19 , 31 ].…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a statistical model can only be built for antibiotics and pathogens for which there are pre-existing data. While the effects of azithromycin use on macrolide resistance among S. pneumoniae and E. coli are fairly well studied [ 1 , 18 , 27 , 28 ], the effect of azithromycin use on resistance in other pathogens is poorly documented [ 44 ]. Comparing use-resistance associations across pathogens and antibiotics [ 21 , 23 , 45 ] may help fill in some gaps, but this approach is now only speculative.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Individuals living in these communities have had more intense TF transmission in the past leading to early onset of scarring and early progression of scarring. This assumes this current high TF rate is also indicative of prior high TF rates, an assumption which is reasonable given the way TF declines with MDA [21,22]. Research has shown that scarring can progress even after low Ct infection and active trachoma levels, likely due to ongoing inflammatory processes [2,[4][5][6]18,23,24] so at this point we do not expect that the trachoma rates are driving progression, but are rather indicative of past high exposure.…”
Section: Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases
mentioning
confidence: 86%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Risks for AMR development are not limited to the specific antimicrobial agent used to treat a particular infection, as suggested in a recent revision of a Cochrane systematic review on the mass treatment of trachoma using antibiotics [ 32 ]. Here, evidence shows with high certainty that S. pneumoniae , S. aureus and Escherichia coli exhibited approximately fivefold increase in resistance at 12 months not only to agents used to treat trachoma, namely azithromycin and tetracycline, but also to clindamycin despite having no role in trachoma management [ 32 ]. Likewise, Doan et al [ 25 ] found that beta-lactam resistance determinants were 2.1 times (95% CI 1.2–4.0) higher after mass azithromycin distribution.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Competition also occurs between hosts: susceptibility and resistance both spill over between populations, with important implications for MDA [ 26 ]. For example, rates of macrolide resistance among S. pneumoniae and E. coli carried by recipients of MDA-azithromycin increase substantially after treatment [ 1 , 27 , 28 ] but then appear to wane in the succeeding months [ 29 , 30 ]. Although this waning could be partly due to intra-individual effects, population-level effects likely play an important role: susceptible strains in untreated individuals can be transmitted to antibiotic-treated individuals [ 19 , 31 ].…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a statistical model can only be built for antibiotics and pathogens for which there are pre-existing data. While the effects of azithromycin use on macrolide resistance among S. pneumoniae and E. coli are fairly well studied [ 1 , 18 , 27 , 28 ], the effect of azithromycin use on resistance in other pathogens is poorly documented [ 44 ]. Comparing use-resistance associations across pathogens and antibiotics [ 21 , 23 , 45 ] may help fill in some gaps, but this approach is now only speculative.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Individuals living in these communities have had more intense TF transmission in the past leading to early onset of scarring and early progression of scarring. This assumes this current high TF rate is also indicative of prior high TF rates, an assumption which is reasonable given the way TF declines with MDA [21,22]. Research has shown that scarring can progress even after low Ct infection and active trachoma levels, likely due to ongoing inflammatory processes [2,[4][5][6]18,23,24] so at this point we do not expect that the trachoma rates are driving progression, but are rather indicative of past high exposure.…”
Section: Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases
mentioning
confidence: 86%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Risks for AMR development are not limited to the specific antimicrobial agent used to treat a particular infection, as suggested in a recent revision of a Cochrane systematic review on the mass treatment of trachoma using antibiotics [ 32 ]. Here, evidence shows with high certainty that S. pneumoniae , S. aureus and Escherichia coli exhibited approximately fivefold increase in resistance at 12 months not only to agents used to treat trachoma, namely azithromycin and tetracycline, but also to clindamycin despite having no role in trachoma management [ 32 ]. Likewise, Doan et al [ 25 ] found that beta-lactam resistance determinants were 2.1 times (95% CI 1.2–4.0) higher after mass azithromycin distribution.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Competition also occurs between hosts: susceptibility and resistance both spill over between populations, with important implications for MDA [ 26 ]. For example, rates of macrolide resistance among S. pneumoniae and E. coli carried by recipients of MDA-azithromycin increase substantially after treatment [ 1 , 27 , 28 ] but then appear to wane in the succeeding months [ 29 , 30 ]. Although this waning could be partly due to intra-individual effects, population-level effects likely play an important role: susceptible strains in untreated individuals can be transmitted to antibiotic-treated individuals [ 19 , 31 ].…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a statistical model can only be built for antibiotics and pathogens for which there are pre-existing data. While the effects of azithromycin use on macrolide resistance among S. pneumoniae and E. coli are fairly well studied [ 1 , 18 , 27 , 28 ], the effect of azithromycin use on resistance in other pathogens is poorly documented [ 44 ]. Comparing use-resistance associations across pathogens and antibiotics [ 21 , 23 , 45 ] may help fill in some gaps, but this approach is now only speculative.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Individuals living in these communities have had more intense TF transmission in the past leading to early onset of scarring and early progression of scarring. This assumes this current high TF rate is also indicative of prior high TF rates, an assumption which is reasonable given the way TF declines with MDA [21,22]. Research has shown that scarring can progress even after low Ct infection and active trachoma levels, likely due to ongoing inflammatory processes [2,[4][5][6]18,23,24] so at this point we do not expect that the trachoma rates are driving progression, but are rather indicative of past high exposure.…”
Section: Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases
mentioning
confidence: 86%