2004
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-0308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antiangiogenic and Proapoptotic Effects of Dietary Restriction on Experimental Mouse and Human Brain Tumors

Abstract: Purpose: The antiangiogenic and proapoptotic mechanisms of dietary caloric restriction (DR) are unknown. In this study, we evaluated the effects of moderate (40%) DR on the orthotopic growth of mouse and human brain tumors that differ in cell origin, angiogenicity, host environment, and biochemical composition.Experimental Design: A malignant mouse astrocytoma (CT-2A) and a human glioma (U87-MG) were highly angiogenic and fast growing, whereas a mouse ependymoblastoma was less vascularized and slower growing. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
156
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
20
156
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, numerous studies show that dietary energy restriction is a general metabolic therapy that naturally lowers circulating glucose levels and significantly reduces growth and progression of numerous tumor types to include cancers of the mammary, brain, colon, pancreas, lung, and prostate [10,[247][248][249][250][251][252][253][254][255][256]. The influence of energy restriction on tumor growth, however, can depend on host background and tumor growth site, as energy restriction is effective in reducing the U87 human glioma when grown orthotopically in the brain of immunodeficient SCID mice [175], but not when grown outside the brain in non-obese diabetic SCID mice [257]. Nevertheless, the bulk of evidence indicates that dietary energy restriction can retard the growth rate of many tumors regardless of the specific genetic defects expressed within the tumor.…”
Section: Implications Of the Hypothesis To Cancer Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, numerous studies show that dietary energy restriction is a general metabolic therapy that naturally lowers circulating glucose levels and significantly reduces growth and progression of numerous tumor types to include cancers of the mammary, brain, colon, pancreas, lung, and prostate [10,[247][248][249][250][251][252][253][254][255][256]. The influence of energy restriction on tumor growth, however, can depend on host background and tumor growth site, as energy restriction is effective in reducing the U87 human glioma when grown orthotopically in the brain of immunodeficient SCID mice [175], but not when grown outside the brain in non-obese diabetic SCID mice [257]. Nevertheless, the bulk of evidence indicates that dietary energy restriction can retard the growth rate of many tumors regardless of the specific genetic defects expressed within the tumor.…”
Section: Implications Of the Hypothesis To Cancer Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dietary energy restriction specifically targets the IGF-1/PI3K/Akt/HIF-1α signaling pathway, which underlies several cancer hallmarks to include cell proliferation, evasion of apoptosis, and angiogenesis [168,175,176,250,251,254,[258][259][260][261][262][263][264][265]. Calorie restriction also causes a simultaneous down-regulation of multiple Figure 2 Linking the hallmarks of cancer to impaired energy metabolism.…”
Section: Targeting Glucosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the problems associated with the translation of DR into clinical applications is that chronic DR delays but does not stop the progression of the disease (Mukherjee et al, 2004;Bonorden et al, 2009;Shelton et al, 2010), and that this delay will occur for only a subset of malignancies (Kalaany and Sabatini, 2009). Although weight loss and cachexia in the early stages of cancer progression are not as common as thought (Tisdale, 2002;Fearon et al, 2003;Fox et al, 2009), the B15% loss of body mass index caused by a moderate (20%) calorie restriction (Racette et al, 2006) would prevent its use in the great majority of cancer treatment scenarios.…”
Section: Dr and Cancer Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the angiogenic microvessel density (MVD), frozen sections (8-10 µm) of each group were made and stained with antibody of cD31 (1:200, BD Biosciences). then MVD was determined by examining vascular hot spots at low power (x100) as described previously (24). Vessels with a clearly defined brown-staining lumen or well defined linear vessel shape, were taken into account for blood microvessels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%