2019
DOI: 10.1177/1687814019834458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-swing control of the overhead crane system based on the harmony search radial basis function neural network algorithm

Abstract: The swing of the grab is a main factor affecting the working efficiency of overhead cranes. Thus, planning the optimal motion path can reduce the adverse effects caused by the grab swing and improve the loading and unloading efficiency. The dynamic model of the trolley-grab system is established by considering factors like the change of rope length, wind load, and air resistance. First, the radial basis function neural network is applied to generate a feasible motion trajectory of the crane trolley. Taking the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the results of experimental group 1 (Figures [12][13][14], in the non-zero initial state, the three control methods have varying degrees of overshoot, and the maximum control amount also increases. However, all three control methods cause the system to converge to a stable state within 8 s. Further analysis shows that the trolley convergence speed (ATSMC: 4.8 s, MSMC: 7.3 s, LQR: 5 s) and overshoot (ATSMC: 0.04 m, MSMC: 0.09 m, LQR: 0.08 m) are smaller.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing the results of experimental group 1 (Figures [12][13][14], in the non-zero initial state, the three control methods have varying degrees of overshoot, and the maximum control amount also increases. However, all three control methods cause the system to converge to a stable state within 8 s. Further analysis shows that the trolley convergence speed (ATSMC: 4.8 s, MSMC: 7.3 s, LQR: 5 s) and overshoot (ATSMC: 0.04 m, MSMC: 0.09 m, LQR: 0.08 m) are smaller.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A better control effect is obtained, even in the case of external interference. Therefore, a series of closed-loop control methods have been proposed, including model predictive control, 6 adaptive control, 7,8 output-feedback control, 9,10 intelligent control, [11][12][13][14] energy-based control [15][16][17][18] and sliding mode control. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] The design of bridge crane control systems often involves the problems of model uncertainty, parameter perturbation and external interference in practical industrial applications, which can be solved by the sliding mode control efficiently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern approaches belong to a group of methods that synthesize a certain movement of the suspension point, which, in turn, optimizes the payload movement [13]. It involves using the shaping controllers [14], the mathematical apparatus of fuzzy logic [15], the control by means of neural networks [16], the inverse dynamics method [17] and other approaches [18]. In paper [19], a method is proposed and a mathematical model is developed to solve the problem of moving a payload by a bridge crane on a non-rigid rope suspension along any curved horizontal trajectory specified as a smoothed curve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control system was designed based on the adaptive feedback control and predictive unity magnitude shaper system using the NNUMZV-APIDLNN algorithm. Moreover, some researchers present the study of the Fuzzy and LQR-PID controllers for anti-swing control of overhead cranes [18], the Harmony Search radial basis function neural network algorithm for optimal anti-swing motion trajectory [19], the differential evolution (DE) algorithm based fuzzy logic for PID optimal parameters [20], the PSO algorithm for PID-PD parameters optimization [21], and the Riccati discrete-time transfer matrix method of a multibody system (MS-RDTTMM) for control design of overhead motion [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%