2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-pesticide DNA aptamers fail to recognize their targets with asserted micromolar dissociation constants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a number of papers have been published to scrutinize the binding of some commonly used aptamers 52 for important analytes such as arsenic, 53 ethanolamine, 54 ampicillin, 55 and some pesticides. 56 None of them showed binding. In this work, another example was discovered.…”
Section: Sensors and Diagnostics Papermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recently, a number of papers have been published to scrutinize the binding of some commonly used aptamers 52 for important analytes such as arsenic, 53 ethanolamine, 54 ampicillin, 55 and some pesticides. 56 None of them showed binding. In this work, another example was discovered.…”
Section: Sensors and Diagnostics Papermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recently, quite a few papers have been published to scrutinize the aptamers for a few small molecules such as arsenic, ampicillin, chloramphenicol and a few pesticides, [30][31][32][33][34][35] where careful homogeneous binding assays revealed no binding. 36 Given that heterogeneous aptamer binding assays are more difficult to interpret, 37,38 and intrigued by the reported binding assays for ethanolamine, in this work, we examined the binding of the ethanolamine aptamers using homogeneous binding assays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decades, biosensor technology has been proving its capability to complement or replace many of the complicated, relatively expensive, and time-consuming traditional analytical methods [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]. More recently, the use of nucleic acid aptamers as biorecognition elements has brought numerous advantages in comparison with the enzymes or antibodies commonly used in biosensors, such as smaller size, better stability, reversible binding ability, simple chemical modification, and a lower cost [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%