2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-fouling performance of chevron plate heat exchanger by the surface modification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weight of foulant was then normalized to the effective heat transfer area, and it was expressed in mg cm −2 . In non‐invasive technique, the overall thermal resistance (fouling factor) ( R f ) was calculated as an indicator of fouling (Equation (8); Ahn et al, 2019). Rf=1Uf1U01em where, “ U f ” and “ U 0 ” are the overall heat transfer coefficients of the PHE with and without foulants, respectively at time “ t ” and “ t = 0.” The experimental value of U f was calculated using Equation (9) (Ahn et al, 2019).…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The weight of foulant was then normalized to the effective heat transfer area, and it was expressed in mg cm −2 . In non‐invasive technique, the overall thermal resistance (fouling factor) ( R f ) was calculated as an indicator of fouling (Equation (8); Ahn et al, 2019). Rf=1Uf1U01em where, “ U f ” and “ U 0 ” are the overall heat transfer coefficients of the PHE with and without foulants, respectively at time “ t ” and “ t = 0.” The experimental value of U f was calculated using Equation (9) (Ahn et al, 2019).…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In non‐invasive technique, the overall thermal resistance (fouling factor) ( R f ) was calculated as an indicator of fouling (Equation (8); Ahn et al, 2019). Rf=1Uf1U01em where, “ U f ” and “ U 0 ” are the overall heat transfer coefficients of the PHE with and without foulants, respectively at time “ t ” and “ t = 0.” The experimental value of U f was calculated using Equation (9) (Ahn et al, 2019). Uf=QA×()TwiTmo()TwoTmiitalicln[]()TwiTmo()TwoTmi where, "Q" is the heat transfer load, “ A ” is the heat transfer area, “ T m ” and “ T w ” are the temperatures of milk and water, respectively, and the subscripts “ i ” and “ o ” indicate inlet and outlet of the PHE, respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sea water entering plate-type heat exchangers can occupy 1.5 mm-thin spaces within a chamber separated by titanium or stainless-steel plates through which heat is advected from fresh water and diffused by sea water departing the chamber (Gust et al, 2018b). Modern plate designs include varying degrees of herringbone patterns on plate surfaces (theta chevron angles) which can increase water velocity and turbulence in the narrow gaps between plates to increase heat exchange efficiency while reducing fouling risk (Ahn et al, 2019). Likewise, shell-and-tube coolers can have pipe diameters of <1 cm with heat from fresh water in the chamber (shell) being transferred and removed by sea water flowing through a bundle of pipes (tubes) (Gust et al, 2018b).…”
Section: The Flow Of Sea Water Through Issmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, techniques gathered in Table 6 are used either to decrease or to increase intrinsic roughness of SS. Recently, Ahn et al (2019) have used electrochemical etching to make porous SS PHEs with holes at the micro and nano scale. However, these modified surfaces were tested against an inorganic fouling, CaCO 3 , closer to type B fouling (mineral fouling).…”
Section: Top-down Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%