Abstract:AimRecent studies have suggested that intravenous (i.v.) enoxaparin could be used as antithrombotic therapy in patients ongoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, anti-Xa pharmacokinetics following different i.v. dosing regimens is not clearly established.
MethodsA population pharmacokinetic analysis was developed using anti-Xa activities measured in 546 patients who received a single 0.5 mg kg -1 i.v. dose of enoxaparin immediately before PCI. Effects of higher doses (0.75 mg kg -1 and 1 mg kg… Show more
“…26 Thus, body weight-adjusted dosing does appear to be more useful. All these effects imply that enoxaparin may be a more reliable and predictable alternative to UFH; however, comparing anticoagulation effects for these heparins is difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…25 When given intravenously, enoxaparin at 0.5 mg/kg reaches a desired anticoagulation for only up to 2 hours. 26 In the current study, the mean body weight-adjusted dose of UFH was 69.4 Ϯ 12.7 IU/kg for all patients. The body weight-adjusted doses of heparin for the three patients with bleeding complications were 62.5, 71, and 74 IU/kg and thus well within the suggested range for optimal anticoagulation.…”
This pilot study found no difference between enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin during carotid endarterectomy in perioperative bleeding or embolic events. A large multicenter trial seems to be warranted.
“…26 Thus, body weight-adjusted dosing does appear to be more useful. All these effects imply that enoxaparin may be a more reliable and predictable alternative to UFH; however, comparing anticoagulation effects for these heparins is difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…25 When given intravenously, enoxaparin at 0.5 mg/kg reaches a desired anticoagulation for only up to 2 hours. 26 In the current study, the mean body weight-adjusted dose of UFH was 69.4 Ϯ 12.7 IU/kg for all patients. The body weight-adjusted doses of heparin for the three patients with bleeding complications were 62.5, 71, and 74 IU/kg and thus well within the suggested range for optimal anticoagulation.…”
This pilot study found no difference between enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin during carotid endarterectomy in perioperative bleeding or embolic events. A large multicenter trial seems to be warranted.
“…Several studies have shown that an SQ upstream treatment by enoxaparin at the dose of 1 mg/kg twice daily (0.65 mg/kg twice daily for patients with impaired renal function) allows adequate anticoagulation for PCI within 8 h of the last injection, whereas an additional IV bolus of 0.25 to 0.30 mg/kg is needed (13,15,16) if the last SQ was injected more than 8 h and less than 12 h before the procedure. Our work confirms that this enoxaparin dose regimen is associated with an anti-Xa activity in the therapeutic range (0.5 to 1.8 IU/ml) in the large majority of patients (95%) with low rates of under-or over-anticoagulated patients (4% and 1%, respectively).…”
Hemonox CT appears to be a fast and reliable bedside test for detecting patients insufficiently anticoagulated and needing adjustment of anticoagulation therapy with enoxaparin before PCI.
“…A simulated study based on the kinetics of F Xa inhibition after 0.5 mg/kg i.v. dose of enoxaparin [17] reported that after the i.v. dose of 0.75 mg/kg applied before PCI, the anticoagulation effects of enoxaparin >0.5 IU/ml persisted for 3.4±1.1 h and 28% of patients achieved initial inhibition higher than 1.8 IU/ml [13,14].…”
Intravenous enoxaparin induced target F Xa inhibition (>0.6 IU/ml) for 60 min in 82% of study patients. During the 6 h of monitoring, a decrease of thrombin generation (F1 + 2) and sP-selectin levels were observed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.