1996
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199602000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropometric Measurements and Body Proportions Among Chinese Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Anthropometric measurements Standard procedures were followed to measure the body weights, standing heights and arm spans, with the participants wearing only light clothes and no shoes [6,23]. Body weights were measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using a standardized scale.…”
Section: Study Design and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropometric measurements Standard procedures were followed to measure the body weights, standing heights and arm spans, with the participants wearing only light clothes and no shoes [6,23]. Body weights were measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using a standardized scale.…”
Section: Study Design and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, arm span was used for the calculation of the BMI as previous studies [15,16] have shown that the different equations for correction of height loss had its limitation and might not fit every curve. Moreover, it has been shown that there is a significantly high linear correlation between arm span and standing height in healthy children and adolescents (r 2 = 0.99) [17]. Hence, to avoid the height correction problem with different equations [15], arm span was used for the calculation of body mass index (BMI) by dividing the body weight (kg) by squared arm span (m 2 ).…”
Section: Anthropometric Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The period of changing (breaking) of voice was difficult to be knownin boys. The diagnosis of AISwas confirmed on a clinical examination using Adam's forward bending test [5,11,25], and a standard standing radiograph of the Spine. The Adams test was done in ambient temperature, on undressed child.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the literature, Cheng and al [5] didn't find any statistical difference neither in uncorrected height nor in uncorrected sitting height between AIS girls and normal controls at each age group except for the age of 15, however, after corrected trunk loss, girls with the spine deformity were significantly taller than the controls between ages 13 and 15.Yim and al [25 ] compared anthropometric parameters with severity of the curves and concluded that, the uncorrected height was the same for each group of age and the corrected height in AIS group with a Cobb angle greater than 40° was shorter than the matched control at the age of 12, it subsequently caught up and became significantly taller than the control group at the age of 14 to 16 years old After analysisof data of weight, we see that girls with AIS are underweight at an age of 16, and BMI was significantly lower with p=0.001. Certain authors [5,25] reported that weight and BMI were lower in AIS than in controls, for Yim and all other authors, it was significantly lower in the AIS20 and AIS40 groups across all ages except for the age of 15 years. Concerning boys, corrected and uncorrected heights are significantly higher than matched controls at age of 14, while Wang who studied arm spans and corrected standing heights showed that these measurements were similar, in most of the ages [18] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%