“…In previously reported cases of prenatally diagnosed OI that applied DNA based techniques, the indication was either a severe form of the disease (type II or III) (Valli et al, 1993;DiMaio et al, 1993;Raghunath et al, 1994;Gomez-Lira et al, 1994), or an ultrasonographic abnormality compatible with OI in the appropriate familial context (Ghosh et al, 1984;Robinson et al, 1987;Constantine et al, 1991;Thompson, 1993;Bulas et al, 1994;Berge et al, 1995). Evaluation of the accuracy of ultrasonography in assigning speci®c diagnoses in lethal skeletal dysplasias, including OI, yielded a rate of about 50%, and in 8/14 cases, the erroneous diagnosis impacted the accuracy of genetic counselling (Tretter et al, 1998). The other alternative for prenatal diagnosis, biochemical assessment of the amount and integrity of procollagen, is not readily available worldwide, and also requires CVS rather then amniocentesis, as the protein is not expressed in amniocytes (Grange et al, 1990).…”