Anomalous sea-floor backscatter patterns in methane venting areas, Dnepr paleo-delta, NW Black Sea

Abstract

The relation between acoustic seafloor backscatter and seep distribution is examined by integrating multibeam backscatter data and seep locations detected by single-beam echosounder. This study is further supported by side scan sonar recordings, high-resolution 5 kHz seismic data, pore-water analysis, grain-size analysis and visual seafloor observations. The datasets were acquired during the 2003 and 2004 expeditions of the EC-funded CRIMEA project in the Dnepr paleo-delta area, northwestern Black Sea.More than 600 active methane seeps were hydro-acoustically detected within a small (3.96 km by 3.72 km) area on the continental shelf of the Dnepr paleo-delta in water depths ranging from -72 m to -156 m. Multibeam and side scan sonar recordings show backscatter patterns that are clearly associated with seepage or with a present dune area. Seeps generally occur within medium-to highbackscatter areas which often coincide with pockmarks.High-resolution seismic data reveal the presence of an undulating gas front, i.e. the top of the free gas in the subsurface, which domes up towards and intersects the seafloor at locations where gas seeps and medium-to high-backscatter values are detected. Pore-water analysis of 4 multi-cores, taken at different backscatter intensity sites, shows a clear correlation between backscatter intensity and dissolved methane fluxes. All analyzed chemical species indicate increasing anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) from medium-to high-backscatter locations. This is confirmed by visual seafloor observations, showing bacterial mats and authigenic carbonates formed by AOM. Grain-size analysis of the 4 multi-cores only reveals negligible variations between the different backscatter sites.Integration of all datasets leads to the conclusion that the observed backscatter patterns are the result of ongoing methane seepage and the precipitation of methane-derived authigenic carbonates (MDACs) caused by AOM. The carbonate formation also appears to lead to a gradual (self-)sealing of the seeps by cementing fluid pathways/horizons followed by a relocation of the bubble-releasing locations. KeywordsMethane seeps; acoustic seafloor backscatter; anaerobic oxidation of methane; bacterial mats; pockmarks; methane-derived authigenic carbonates

Flow and fracture in water-saturated, unconstrained granular beds

“…The parameter χ, introduced in previous works and emphasized in Section 3.1, provides a way to quantify the importance not only of the average grain size, but also of its distribution [42][43][44]. Equation (1) shows that it is easy to estimate from the granular medium or soil granulometry. From its other formulation (Equation 2), it is possible to link it with the Bond number, as χ = w/Bo, where w is the relative variation of the pore size.…”

“…It includes a large variety of phenomena such as methane venting [1], hydraulic fractures [2][3][4], pockmarks [5][6][7], hydrothermal complexes [8,9], kimberlite pipes [10][11][12] or mud volcanoes [13][14][15][16]. Since the 90's, the technique of air sparging has also been developed.…”

Air invasion in a granular layer immersed in a fluid: morphology and dynamics

“…Gas invasion in an immersed granular layer is a widespread phenomenon of striking importance in many contexts, from oil industry [1,2] to soil decontamination, where air injection in the subsurface and its subsequent rising by buoyancy removes or chemically degrades the contaminants [3]. In natural processes, piercement structures display many examples of such phenomenon [4].…”

Influence on present-day coastal dynamics and evolution of a relict subaqueous delta lobe: Sol de Riu lobe, Ebro Delta

“…Previous studies suggested that the presence of free gas in the subsurface sediments (first ~ 20 cm) influences the acoustic properties of the sediment amplifying the energy scattering because of the increased acoustic impedance (e.g. Boyle and Chotiros, 1995;Fonseca et al, 2002;Hagan and Vogt, 1999;Naudts et al, 2008;Sweeney et al, 2012), although, Fonesca et al (2002 postulated that in shallow water the presence of free gas in the subsurface sediments reduces the backscatter intensity due to the decrease in sediment sound speed. High-resolution reflection seismic systems are significantly affected by the presence of shallow gas and are commonly used for the detection of free gas in sediments (e.g.…”