2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.87.147003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalous Electronic Structure and Pseudogap Effects inNd1.85Ce0.15CuO4

Abstract: We report a high-resolution angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopic study of the electron-doped ( n-type) cuprate superconductor Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4. We observe regions along the Fermi surface where the near- E(F) intensity is suppressed and the spectral features are broad in a manner reminiscent of the high-energy "pseudogap" in the underdoped p-type (hole doped) cuprates. However, instead of occurring near the (pi,0) region, as in the p-type materials, this pseudogap falls near the intersection of the underl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

36
91
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(13 reference statements)
36
91
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is seen, that «destruction» of the Fermi surface starts in the vicinity of «hot spots» for small values of D, but almost immediately it disappears in the whole antinodal region of the Brillouin zone, while only «Fermi arcs» remain in the nodal region very close to the «bare» Fermi surface. These results give a natural explanation of the observed behavior and also of the fact that the existence of «hot spots» regions was observed only in some rare cases [22]. …”
Section: «Destruction» Of the Fermi Surfacesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…It is seen, that «destruction» of the Fermi surface starts in the vicinity of «hot spots» for small values of D, but almost immediately it disappears in the whole antinodal region of the Brillouin zone, while only «Fermi arcs» remain in the nodal region very close to the «bare» Fermi surface. These results give a natural explanation of the observed behavior and also of the fact that the existence of «hot spots» regions was observed only in some rare cases [22]. …”
Section: «Destruction» Of the Fermi Surfacesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In other words, the Dirac fermion without the AF gap is never relevant to the underdoped cuprates. This is also consistent with the asymmetry of ARPES between holedoped [2] and electron-doped [34] cuprates. Recent experiments on NCCO [34] strongly suggest that the minima of the electron dispersion are at k = (π, 0) and (0, π), and the particle-hole symmetry is broken.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The seeming lack of observation, yet, of electron and hole pockets in other measurements in hole-doped superconductors, in particular in angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy that is also capable of measuring the Fermi surface, is an important puzzle; see, however, the work on electron-doped materials (39) where both electron and hole pockets are observed. Clearly, further experiments are necessary to settle these important issues more definitively, but our simple symmetry-breaking approach remains a serious challenge to alternative scenarios, which have to be consistent with all of the experimental facts, in particular the negative Hall coefficient, as well as the theoretical constraints of the Luttinger sum rule, known to be valid for a whole class of systems, including Mott insulators (40).…”
Section: Fermi Surface Reconstruction ͉ Hall Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%