Proceedings of the 2018 ACM on International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3206025.3206056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annotating, Understanding, and Predicting Long-term Video Memorability

Abstract: Memorability can be regarded as a useful metric of video importance to help make a choice between competing videos. Research on computational understanding of video memorability is however in its early stages. There is no available dataset for modelling purposes, and the few previous attempts provided protocols to collect video memorability data that would be difficult to generalize. Furthermore, the computational features needed to build a robust memorability predictor remain largely undiscovered. In this art… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(73 reference statements)
6
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Could people remember dance segments in the first place, given the relatively p.12 difficult nature of the task with the high visual similarity across segments and the complexity of the actions they were seeing? Average hit rate (HR) was 45.77% (SD=13.25%; and this is consistent with what has been found in previous work exploring video memorability for scenes from movies [HR=46.71%, Cohendet et al, 2018]), and average false alarm rate (FAR) was 12.29% (SD=6.49%). Average d' sensitivity further confirmed basic memory (M=1.11, SD=0.36).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Could people remember dance segments in the first place, given the relatively p.12 difficult nature of the task with the high visual similarity across segments and the complexity of the actions they were seeing? Average hit rate (HR) was 45.77% (SD=13.25%; and this is consistent with what has been found in previous work exploring video memorability for scenes from movies [HR=46.71%, Cohendet et al, 2018]), and average false alarm rate (FAR) was 12.29% (SD=6.49%). Average d' sensitivity further confirmed basic memory (M=1.11, SD=0.36).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These results align with previous findings that we can effectively store dynamic actions in memory (Vicary et al, 2014;Wood, 2007;Urgolites & Wood, 2013). They also align with p.19 previous work on memorability of dynamic videos (Cohendet et al, 2018;Newman et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recognition memorability is also robust for other types of items, such as abstract visualisations [4], and specific objects within scenes [5]. This intrinsic property is not limited to static images, with faces shown to be consistently memorable across expression and viewpoint distortions [6], and videos shown to be highly consistent in memory performance for both soundless 10-second movie clips [7], and 3-6 second viral videos [8].…”
Section: A Visual Memorabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It represents the first attempt to build a large-scale corpus regarding video visual memory, which were typically limited to a few hundred of samples in previous works. Added to this, videos were not collected from TRECVID or Hollywood-like films [21,22], but extracted from raw footage originally designed to serve as generic material for professional editing of films or advertisements. Clips are of high quality (HD) and are provided as short soundless videos of 7 s in .webm format, with a bitrate of 3000 kps for 24 fps.…”
Section: Videomemmentioning
confidence: 99%