2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.11.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic tensile properties of recovery annealed aluminum alloy sheet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the present data is on extruded and rolled alloys which do have a strong texture, and we will take account of that. For rolled and extruded alloys, generally the yield strength will be lowest in a direction at a 45° angle from the longitudinal (L) direction (see [62] for Al-ZnMg extrusions, [63] for Al-Cu based sheet, [64] for commercial purity sheet, [65] for a recovery annealed aluminium alloy), and the L direction has the highest yield strength. The increment in M in the L direction compared to the texture free case is on average 5% (from data in [50,61,63,64]).…”
Section: Strength and Hardness Model Predictions Based On The Co-clusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the present data is on extruded and rolled alloys which do have a strong texture, and we will take account of that. For rolled and extruded alloys, generally the yield strength will be lowest in a direction at a 45° angle from the longitudinal (L) direction (see [62] for Al-ZnMg extrusions, [63] for Al-Cu based sheet, [64] for commercial purity sheet, [65] for a recovery annealed aluminium alloy), and the L direction has the highest yield strength. The increment in M in the L direction compared to the texture free case is on average 5% (from data in [50,61,63,64]).…”
Section: Strength and Hardness Model Predictions Based On The Co-clusmentioning
confidence: 99%