2020
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1860133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotine and amarogentin as promising inhibitory candidates against SARS-CoV-2 proteins: a computational investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(104 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, the free spike, M pro and PL pro proteins were noted to display considerable fluctuations throughout the timescale of the MD simulations and returned average RMSD values of 1.9 Å, 1.5 Å and 1.8 Å, respectively (Figures 5A, 6A and 7A). It has been suggested that lower RMSD values reflect higher conformational stability of protein-protein complexes [22,27]. The present findings reflected the decent binding potential of cyanovirin-N with the SARS-CoV-2 proteins and emphasized the fact that the binding of cyanovirin-N to the viral proteins imparted considerable stability to the complexes [21].…”
Section: Analysis Of Molecular Dynamics Simulations Of the Protein-protein Complexessupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the contrary, the free spike, M pro and PL pro proteins were noted to display considerable fluctuations throughout the timescale of the MD simulations and returned average RMSD values of 1.9 Å, 1.5 Å and 1.8 Å, respectively (Figures 5A, 6A and 7A). It has been suggested that lower RMSD values reflect higher conformational stability of protein-protein complexes [22,27]. The present findings reflected the decent binding potential of cyanovirin-N with the SARS-CoV-2 proteins and emphasized the fact that the binding of cyanovirin-N to the viral proteins imparted considerable stability to the complexes [21].…”
Section: Analysis Of Molecular Dynamics Simulations Of the Protein-protein Complexessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The binding efficacies of the cyanobacterial proteins with SARS-CoV-2 M pro were further compared with the interaction profile of the Michael acceptor (peptidyl) inhibitor that has been recently reported to exhibit significant inhibitory efficacy against the SARS-CoV-2 M pro [37]. Quite interestingly, the cyanobacterial proteins displayed significantly higher (p < 0.01) binding energy scores than the Michael acceptor (peptidyl) inhibitor-SARS-CoV-2 M pro complex (−7.1 kcal/mol) (Table 1) [27]. Furthermore, the electrophilicity of α and β unsaturated systems suggests that the Michael acceptor may interact with off-target proteins [46].…”
Section: Molecular Docking Of the Cyanobacterial Proteins With The Sars-cov-2 M Promentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Individuals with chronic diabetes accompanied with foot ulcers are prone to this infection as any injured skin tissue is an easy entry route for this fungus. Further, treatment for COVID-19 is still preliminary ( Kar et al, 2020 ; Kinoshita et al, 2021 ), and to combat the effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection, patients are given heavy doses of steroids (corticosteroids), as it reduces the inflammation in the lungs and might also curb the damages that had happened in the body due to the cytokine storm. Meanwhile patients affected with this new strain of COVID-19 are mostly treated with heavy steroids, extreme use of oxygen masks and ventilators which makes these patients more susceptible to mucormycosis.…”
Section: Possible Role Of Action Of Mucormycosis Among Covid-19 Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding affinity of anisotine as a quinazoline alkaloid of the leaves of Justicia adhatoda L. (Acanthaceae) to SARS-CoV-2 Mpro was reported to be −7.9 kcal/mol that was stronger than that of darunavir and lopinavir, as positive control drugs [ 59 ]. Besides, Kar et al showed the predicted the inhibitory constant (Ki) of anisotine interaction with Mpro, S proteins, and RdRp of SARS-CoV-2 was 1.90 μ M, 0.70 μ M, and 47.08 μ M, respectively [ 60 ].…”
Section: Alkaloids As Potential Phytochemicals Against Sars-cov-2mentioning
confidence: 99%