1986
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.33.3644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angle-resolved photoemission study of the surface and bulk electronic structure of Mg(0001) and Mg(110)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
21
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two surface states with energies 1 SS = −1.53 eV and 2 SS = −1.46 eV are located inside the ∼1.1 eV-wide band gap covering the interval between −1.94 eV and −0.8 eV. Our values for the two surface-state energies are close to the measured value (∼−1.6 eV) [37]. The wave function of the energetically lower surface state is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Chulkov Modelsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two surface states with energies 1 SS = −1.53 eV and 2 SS = −1.46 eV are located inside the ∼1.1 eV-wide band gap covering the interval between −1.94 eV and −0.8 eV. Our values for the two surface-state energies are close to the measured value (∼−1.6 eV) [37]. The wave function of the energetically lower surface state is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Chulkov Modelsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…For the 31-layer Mg thin film we thus calculated the projected VB width according to HS − LS = 6.80 eV. This value exceeds the band width measured for Mg(0001) single crystals (6.15 eV) [37]. Two surface states with energies 1 SS = −1.53 eV and 2 SS = −1.46 eV are located inside the ∼1.1 eV-wide band gap covering the interval between −1.94 eV and −0.8 eV.…”
Section: Chulkov Modelmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As was shown in Refs. [15][16][17], where band structures calculated with the LDA-functional for simple metals were compared with measurements made with angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, LDA can obviously not account properly for the correlation effects in such systems. This can also be confirmed by LDA-calculated ground-state properties of magnesium: strong underestimation of both lattice constants, that gives by accident rather good agreement with the ideal c/a ratio, but a too high cohesive energy [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In consequence, surface-state holes in narrow band gaps decay much faster in general than surface-state holes in wide gaps if located at comparable initial state energy. Examples are Al(1 0 0) [148,149], Al(1 1 1) [149] and Mg(0 0 0 1) [53,150]. All quoted examples were studied rather early at room temperature.…”
Section: Other Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%