2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2017.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anemia in diabetes: Experience of a single treatment center in Kuwait

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
2
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
4
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that diabetic females were at higher risk of anemia than diabetic males. This finding is consistent with the findings of Alsayegh et al (2017) which reported prevalence as 35.8% vs. 21.3% in diabetic females versus diabetic males [21]. The possible reason for higher prevalence of anemia in females might be due to poor nutrition, less importance given to their own health due to lack of empowerment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We found that diabetic females were at higher risk of anemia than diabetic males. This finding is consistent with the findings of Alsayegh et al (2017) which reported prevalence as 35.8% vs. 21.3% in diabetic females versus diabetic males [21]. The possible reason for higher prevalence of anemia in females might be due to poor nutrition, less importance given to their own health due to lack of empowerment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Renal impairment leads to anemia though impaired production of erythropoietin by peritubular fibroblast of the kidney, [65][66][67] urinary erythropoietin losses, 68 reduced RBC life span due to uremic environment and the possible role of circulating uremic-induced prevention of erythropoiesis. 69,70 40% 44% However, this study deviates from another study conducted in India, which showed a higher rate of the microcytic hypochromic type of anemia. 71 The low prevalence of microcytic hypochromic anemia in this study could be explained by their residence and access to health care services.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Similar to our study, AlDallal et al [37] found that females with T2DM are at higher risk of anemia than males. This is consistent with findings of Alsayegh et al which reported a prevalence of 35.8% in females versus 21.3% in males [49].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%